Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Flood Design Strategies
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-1020-2002
drains and snow and ice loads. These were either developed during the
design of existing facilities or will be those from applicable regulations. If
the design criteria for the roof is exceeded (i.e., deflection, stress
allowables), the design must be revised (see Step 9).
9.
If the DBFL for a SSC due to local precipitation produces levels of
flooding such that the performance goals (i.e., damage level due to
inundation or exceedance of design criteria allowables), are not satisfied,
design modifications must be developed. The design modifications must
provide additional capacity (i.e., runoff capacity, additional strength) to
satisfy the performance goals. Alternative design strategies are discussed
in Section 4.1.3.
10.
For SSCs that are impacted by the DBFL, emergency operation plans must
be developed to provide for the safety of personnel and to secure critical
areas to satisfy performance goals.
In principle, each SSC is designed in accordance with the requirements for the applicable
Performance Category. However, because floods have a common-cause impact on SSCs that are
in proximity to one another, the design basis for the most critical SSC may govern the design for
other SSCs or for the entire site. Stated differently, it may be more realistic economically and
functionally to develop a design strategy that satisfies the performance goals of the most critical
SSC and simultaneously that of other SSCs. For example, it may be feasible to harden a site
(e.g., construct a levee system), thus protecting all SSCs. Conversely, it may be impractical to
develop a design strategy that protects the entire site when SSC locations vary substantially (i.e.,
they are at significantly different elevations or there are large spatial separations).
The possible structural or functional interaction between SSCs should be considered as
part of the evaluation process. For example, if an SSC in Performance Category 4 requires
emergency electric power in order to satisfy the performance goals, structures that house
emergency generators and fuel should be designed to the DBFL for the Performance Category 4
SSC. In general, a systematic review of a site for possible structural or functional dependencies
is required. As an aid to the review, the analyst can develop a logic model that displays the
functional/structural dependencies between SSCs.
4.1.3 Flood Design Strategies
The basic design strategy for SSCs in Performance Categories 2 to 4 (excluding local
precipitation), is to construct the SSC above the DBFL. When this can be done, flood hazards
are not considered in the design basis except that possible raised ground water level must be
considered. The flood criteria have been established with this basic strategy in mind. Note that
local precipitation is an exception since all sites must consider this hazard in the design of the
site stormwater management system, roof systems, etc.
4-7


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business