Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Example 8: Hazard Screening Tools used to Support Graded Task Hazard Analysis
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-1120-2005/Vol. 2
containers successfully performed their pressure-wave barrier function and prevented damage to the
adjacent facilities and components.
Example 8:
Hazard Screening Tools used to Support Graded Task Hazard Analysis
To support the deactivation of a plutonium processing facility, a task-based hazard screening process was
implemented. Over the course of the project, two different hazard screening tools were used to assist in
grading hazard analysis activities. The first tool, which was the Preliminary Hazard Screening and
Assessment (PHSA), aided the project team in selecting the appropriate level of analysis based on the
team's experience in conducting the task, the complexity of task activities and overall perceived risk. A
PHSA checklist was organized to elicit these project characteristics and completed by the cognizant
engineer and safety analyst for each major deactivation task. For example, a PHSA was completed for
the task of transferring contaminated nitric acid from large tanks to tanker trucks for shipment. The
results of the screening indicated that the task was complex; involved chemical, radiological, and physical
hazards; and had not been conducted previously. Additionally, since the task involved handling of 48
weight percent nitric acid with uranium contamination, and failure of the coupling equipment could result
in severe consequences to workers, facility management concluded that a more detailed hazard analysis
was warranted.
As the project progressed, the PHSA was expanded to a computerized task hazard screening tool that
accommodated self-directed work teams. The newly expanded tool served three main functions: (1) to
assist work teams in identification of hazards and appropriate controls; (2) to identify the need for
involvement of safety professionals to ensure that appropriate controls are established; and (3) to identify
tasks that require additional analysis, such as Job Safety Analysis or Hazard and Operability Study. The
computerized screening tool consisted of several screens, each addressing separate task hazards (e.g.,
nuclear safety, industrial safety, industrial hygiene, and radiological protection). In cases where the
hazards were well known and evaluated, and work was routine ( i.e., skill of the craft with approved
radiological controls and no permits required, such as cutting and welding), a simple hazards checklist
was all that was required.
One key to this process was the fact that the workers involved in task activities participated in the hazard
screening process. Resulting information was used in the pre-job briefing to ensure that all workers were
aware of the hazards and controls. Using this process, the incidents of lost work day injuries decreased
significantly during the project.
B-10


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business