Quantcast Example Contingency Control Table

 

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Example Contingency Control Table
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 

Share on Google+Share on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on TwitterShare on DiggShare on Stumble Upon
Back
Identify potential contingency scenarios
Up
Guidelines for Preparing Criticality Safety Evaluations at Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facilities
Next
Credited Controls and Assumptions


DOE-STD-3007-2007
Example Contingency Control Table
Contingency (i.e., unlikely
Controlled
Controls
process condition)
Parameter
Mass
Single double batched container
1. Procedure requiring mass
in the workstation in an array of
measurement
properly loaded containers.
2. Prejob review of applicable
criticality safety limits
3. Procedure requiring mass to be
checked prior to transfer of
material
4. Procedure requiring mass to be
verified by independent operator
prior to beginning operation
1. Prejob review of applicable
Interaction
Two containers in contact in one
criticality safety limits
workstation immediately
2. PC-3 qualified rack holding a
adjacent to two containers in
maximum of three approved
contact in adjoining workstation
containers
making a total of four containers
3. Procedures and limits permit
in contact.
only one container out of the
rack at a time in each
workstation
4. Seismically qualified racks
F. EVALUATION AND RESULTS
The use of this section heading is optional. However, the content described below shall3 be incorporated
by reference or included somewhere in the CSE.
If calculational techniques are used, detailed descriptions of the models (e.g. computer input listings,
material compositions, etc.) shall3 be presented. The level of detail shall3 be sufficient to allow an
independent reviewer to reconstruct the computational model, compare the model with the descriptive
information in Subsection B, and determine if the overall model is accurate and appropriate. Significant
assumptions and simplifications shall3 be stated. Pertinent calculational parameters important to the
understanding of the analysis shall3 be specified or incorporated by reference.
All pertinent calculational results shall3 be reported. Where referenced calculations or reports are used
to support the results of the evaluation, a summary of the referenced calculations should be included.
Plots of data should be clearly labeled. Descriptions/labels of individual computer runs should indicate
the physical attributes of the system being analyzed. Estimated uncertainties in the results (e.g.,
statistical uncertainties associated with Monte Carlo calculations) and any analyzed sensitivities to
8


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc.