Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Identify potential contingency scenarios
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-3007-2007
which should be considered, such as sprinkler activation, glove box rupture, rack collapse and
natural phenomena, as potential initiators of criticality accidents.
2. Identify potential contingency scenarios. Contingencies shall1 be identified. A disciplined
method should be used to identify contingencies. Examples of acceptable methods (see brief
descriptions in DOE-STD-1027-92, Change Notice 1, Section 4.1) are:
What If methods;
Qualitative Event or Fault Trees;
Quantitative Probabilistic Risk Assessment methods;
Hazard and Operability Analysis; and/or
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.
Input should be obtained from operations personnel and process specialists thoroughly familiar
with the operations and possible abnormal conditions. Whenever practical, identified
contingencies should be eliminated by modification of the process.
3. Establish controls. Controlled parameters and their associated limits shall6 be identified in this
section. Examples of parameters subject to control include, but are not limited to, fissionable
material mass, volume, concentration, moderation, interaction, etc. Appropriate operations staff,
engineering staff, and/or process experts should review the postulated contingencies and the
proposed controls to assure practicality. The preferred hierarchy of controls shall8 be: (1) passive
engineered features, (2) active engineered features, and (3) administrative controls. Inspections,
periodic surveillances, or other quality assurance measures should be developed and implemented
to defend the reliability of the selected controls. Other factors that influence the selection of
controls and should be considered, include:
The implementation complexity of the control;
The ability of personnel to recognize the failure of the control;
The potential for common mode failure of controls; and,
The final reliability of the set of controls.
A table showing the unlikely changes in process conditions (contingencies) and the controls that
make the abnormal change unlikely may be summarized in a table. The following is an example of
a contingency control table.
7


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business