Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Explosive Stress: Shock , Blast, and Venting
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-HDBK-3010-94
3.0 Liquids; Aqueous Solutions
3.2.2
E xp losive S tress: S h ock , B last, an d V en tin g
Liquids may be subdivided by the shock generated by detonation-like reactions or by shear
stress at the surface generated by the accelerated airflow from the blast. Venting of
pressurized liquid phenomena is related to explosions as well.
3.2.2.1
S h ock E ffects
Steindler and Seefeldt (1980) provide an empirical correlation to experimental data on the
fragmentation of metals and aqueous solution by detonations [energy releases in
microseconds with brisance (shattering effect)] (Ayer, et al., May 1988). The experiments
performed by others were used to relate releases to mass ratios (i.e., ratio mass of inert
material to TNT equivalent) of 1 to 15. The experiments were conducted with the condensed
phase explosive embedded or contiguous to the material affected. Estimates of the ARF and
size distribution for various mass ratios up to 1000 are provided in Appendix C of
Ayer, et al. (May 1988) for a GSD (Geometric Standard Deviation, the slope of the line on
log probability plot) of 8. The GSD is much greater than normally assumed (GSD 2) due to
potential uncertainties regarding actual energy distribution. The fragmentation of only a
portion of the inert material occurs when MRs are large, and the fraction of shock energy
absorbed by this unknown portion of material is likewise unknown.
All inert material is driven airborne as particulates in the respirable size range for an MR of
one. The volume of material exposed to the shock effects of the explosion is essentially
constant for an explosive charge of a given size as the surface area in proximity to the charge
is fixed. However, as the amount of inert material increases, the fraction of the total mass
exposed to significant shock effects in that volume decreases. Given the potential
uncertainties of the data, this simple relationship will be used to extrapolate respirable
releases from the point of maximum release (i.e., MR = 1).
A respirable release of inert mass equal to the TNT equivalent for the detonation (to a
maximum of 100% release) is considered to bound the Steindler and Seefeldt (1980)
correlation. This assumption is supported by numerical comparison. For MRs of 5, 10, and
15, the combined ARF x RF values predicted by the correlation for a GSD of 2 are 4E-3,
6E-4, and 3E-4 respectively. For MRs of 5, 10, and 15, the combined ARF x RF values
predicted by the correlation for a limiting GSD of 8 are 2E-1, 9E-2, and 7E-2 respectively.
The simple method used by this handbook would predict combined ARF x RF values of
2E-1, 1E-1, and 7E-2, which correlate with the values for a GSD of 8 that are believed to be
very conservative.
Page 3-18


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business