Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Liquid Sampling and Tank Farm Example Assessment
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-HDBK-3010-94
7.0 Application Examples; Liquid Storage and Ion Exchange Examples
would be 11.6 m3, albeit with a smaller density. It is not out of the question that a
chimney effect could be created as well, depending on the use of floor and ceiling
openings.
The ARF and RF for continuous boiling of liquid are 2 E-3 and 1.0 (subsection
3.2.1.2). For a general fire in the vicinity of the tanks, the initial respirable source
terms for DRs of 0.1 and 1.0 are:
42,000 g * 0.1 * 2E-3 * 1.0 = 8.4 g
42,000 g * 1.0 * 2E-3 * 1.0 = 84 g
The range of possible release could be even higher if it is assumed the liquid becomes
superheated. The liquid will become superheated if the rate of liquid boiloff exceeds
the rate of vapor removal through the vessel vent line. The vessel relief valves lift
at ~ 0.07 MPag (10 psig), thus limiting the potential level of superheat to ~ 15 oC.
However, the lifting of the vessel relief valves presents problems of its own.
Potential pressure and superheat are limited, but the release is now occurring directly
into a process room as opposed to the vessel vent system. The ARF and RF for
depressurization of liquid above the boiling point with  50 oC superheat are 1E-2
and 0.6 (subsection 3.2.2.3.3). The associated initial respirable source terms for DRs
of 0.1 and 1.0 are:
42,000 g * 0.1 * 1E-2 * 0.6 = 25 g
42,000 g * 1.0 * 1E-2 * 0.6 = 250 g
7.3.5.3
Liquid Sampling and Tank Farm Example Assessment
The spill examples are not particularly different from the previous spill assessments, and in
general, they support the obvious conclusion that it is desirable to avoid spilling confined
carcinogenic material. Even the large quantities of material involved do not generate releases
above the relatively small range estimated for previous operations. The large room fire, on
the other hand, can be considered genuinely insightful with regard to design and operation.
Up to this point in the examples, bounding initial releases have been on the order of gram
quantities or less. The large room fire is potentially very unrepresentative of this spectrum,
even though the releases cited for this unlikely, but not impossible, event would still not
result in catastrophic consequences to the public. In terms of defense in depth, in
comparison to events previously examined, this event represents a potentially significant
Page 7-32


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business