Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Staffing Needs and Time
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-HDBK-1100-2004
example, a traditional checklist is, by definition, based on the process experience the
author accumulates from various sources. The checklist is likely to provide incomplete
insights into the design, procedural, and operating features necessary for a safe process.
The what-if part of the analysis uses a team's creativity and experience to brainstorm
potential accident scenarios. However, because the what-if analysis method is usually
not as detailed, systematic, or thorough as some of the more regimented approaches (e.g.,
HAZOP study, FMEA), use of a checklist permits the PrHA team to fill in any gaps in
their thought process.
4.3.4 Staffing Needs and Time
The number of individuals needed depends upon the complexity of the process and, to
some extent, the stage at which the process is being evaluated. Normally, a PrHA using
this method requires fewer people and shorter meetings than does a more structured
method such as a HAZOP study. Estimates of the time needed to perform a PrHA using
the what-if/checklist analysis method are shown in Table 4.11.
Table 4.11 Approximate What-If/Checklist Analysis Time Requirements
PREPARATION(a)
DOCUMENTATION(a)
SCOPE
EVALUATION
Simple/Small
System
6 to 12 hours
6 to 12 hours
4 to 8 hours
Complex/Large
Process
1 to 3 days
4 to 7 days
1 to 3 weeks
(a) Primarily, team leader and scribe.
Source: CCPS, 1992.
4.3.5 Example What-If/Checklist Analyses
To fill in the gaps in the standard what-if analyses given as examples in Section 4.2, the
checklists used for the examples in Section 4.1 were used here. The resulting what-
if/checklist analyses for the two example processes are shown in Tables 4.12 and 4.13.
The tables show only additional scenarios identified by applying the checklist.
4.4
Hazard and Operability Study
The HAZOP study was developed to identify hazards in process plants and to identify
operability problems that, although not hazardous, could compromise a plant's
productivity. The basic concept behind HAZOP studies is that processes work well when
operating under design conditions. When deviations from the process design conditions
occur, operability problems and accidents can occur. The HAZOP study method uses
guide words to assist the analysis team in considering the causes and consequences of
41


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business