Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Table 4.4 Approximate Checklist Analysis Time Requirements
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-HDBK-1100-2004
Table 4.4 Approximate Checklist Analysis Time Requirements
SCOPE
PREPARATION
EVALUATION
DOCUMENTATION
Simple/Small
System
2 to 4 hours
4 to 8 hours
4 to 8 hours
Complex/Large Process
1 to 3 days
3 to 5 days
2 to 4 days
4.1.4 Limitations of Checklist Analysis
When derived from handbooks or similar sources, many entries in a checklist may not be
applicable to the process being studied. In other cases, process hazards may be so
unusual they are not in standard checklists. Thus, it may be difficult to assure that all
hazards have been analyzed. Also, checklists may indicate that hazards exist, but not
what accident scenarios are associated with them.
4.1.5 Example Checklist Analyses
Simplified checklist analyses for the two example processes in Section 4.0 are shown in
Tables 4.5 and 4.6. The same checklist was used for both processes.
4.2
What-If Analysis
The purpose of a what-if analysis is to identify hazards, hazardous situations, or specific
accident events that could produce an undesirable consequence. The what-if analysis is
described in detail in Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures (CCPS, 1992).
What-if analysis involves the examination of possible deviations from the design,
construction, modification, or operating intent of a process. It can be used to examine
virtually any aspect of facility design or operation. Because it is so flexible, it can be
performed at any stage in the life of a process using whatever process information and
knowledge is available.
4.2.1 Description of the Method
The what-if analysis is a creative, brainstorming examination of a process or operation
conducted by a group of experienced individuals able to ask questions or voice concerns
about undesired events. It is not as inherently structured as some other methods, such as
the hazard and operability (HAZOP) study or a failure mode and effects analysis
(FMEA). Rather, it requires the analysts to adapt the basic concept to the specific
application.
30


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business