Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: General Considerations for the Presentations
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-HDBK-3027-99
(2) General Considerations for the Presentations
a) Line Management involvement should be emphasized.
b) Areas should be presented by personnel responsible for execution.
c) The goal is to provide the mechanism, processes, and controls that management
uses to provide integrated safety management. Safety statistics on their own are
not useful to demonstrate those processes and controls. (Those statistics may be
the result of no work or layering of requirements that prevent useful work.)
d) Contractor presentations should allow for coordinated presentation of DOE
information as well. For instance, DOE involvement in the budget process may be
easily demonstrated in conjunction with the contractor rather than two separate
presentations of the material related to that topic.
e) The environment in which the presentation is conducted is important.
Presentations will be given over a period of several days. Allow the team space to
spread out notes, handouts, and references. You will provide a lot of paper,
provide space for the team to use it.
f) Make clear the difference between what is the enforced practice and new idea
testing. If the new idea will solve a deficiency in the system, then demonstrate
how the new idea (if it works) will be accepted and implemented into an
enforceable process.
g) Presentations should go to the level of detail that would convince the team that the
specific aspect of the ISMS presented is being executed in such a fashion that
further review is unnecessary.
c. Week Three/Review Process Activities . A one week period was established to
conduct the review. The review consisted of interviews, document reviews, and
observations (primarily attendance at site coordinating meetings when possible). The one
week review period was sufficient. The team was dispatched to various parts of the site
to conduct the interviews rather than having the interviewees report to a central location.
This worked well; however, most of the team had previous site experience. A team with
little site experience might be better served by establishing a central location for
interviews. Approximately 90 interviews of corporate, division, and facility level mangers
were conducted. The following lessons learned as they affect the review process are
provided:
A central Point of Contact (POC) was provided by the contractor for this review. The
involvement and effectiveness of the POC were key factors in ensuring all coordinating
functions were accomplished as requested and in a timely manner. Coordination of
interviews was a major effort. The POC' efforts in scheduling and rescheduling
s
interviews were important to ensure that the necessary interviews were completed.
A-5-8


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business