 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| ||||||||||
|
|  DOE-STD-1063-97
APPENDIX B
II. APPROACH
The approach to be used in performing the Facility Representative Program assessment will
vary between Field Elements. In order to obtain a valuable assessment of the program, the
following methodology is presented.
Documentation. Much information can be determined in advance of the assessment by careful
review of program documentation. This can include:
1. Program directive(s)
2. Performance Indicators (DOE-wide and locally generated)
3. Qualification tracking data
4. Significant Occurrence Reports
5. Performance Assessments including the Facility Representative Program Self-Assessment
6. Training records (including continuing training)
7. Qualification records
8. Facility Representative logs
9. Facility Representative reports
10. Management tracking system for Facility-Representative-reported issues
11. Written and oral examination question banks
Interviews. By discussing the program with its participants, a determination can be made
about program performance `on paper' as opposed to `in reality'. Consideration should be
given to interviewing:
1.
Facility Representative Program managers
2.
Facility Representatives
3.
Facility Representative supervisors
4.
Line managers
5.
Contractor facility managers
6.
Technical Expertise support (health physics, explosive safety, etc)
Walkthroughs. Much information can be determined by performing walkthroughs with the
Facility Representatives. Walkthroughs can provide indication of:
1.
Level of Facility Representative qualification
2.
Actual practices of the facility
3.
Interactions with contractor personnel
4.
Log-keeping and reporting practices
5.
Corrective action verification
Other methods. The preceding list of methods is for example purposes. Additional methods
exist which may help in assessing program performance. These methods should be used as
appropriate.
B-7
|
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |
Click
here for thousands of PDF manuals