Quantcast Approach

 

Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Approach
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 

Share on Google+Share on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on TwitterShare on DiggShare on Stumble Upon
Back
Adequate functional support from the Field Element Management. - std1063_20060044
Up
Facility Representatives - index
Next
Report - std1063_20060046


DOE-STD-1063-2006
Appendix B
What Performance Indicator data is used to provide indication of the Facility
Representative program status? What trending and analysis is done on
Performance Indicator data? How is this information used? [Section 5.8.1
and Appendix A]
What incentive programs are in place and used effectively for the Facility
Representative position? [Section 5.7.6]
Do these programs make the Facility Representative position desirable and
career enhancing? [Section 5.7.6]
5. Performance assessment and feedback program in place.
How often does the Field Element conduct self-assessments of the entire
Facility Representative program? [Section 5.8.2 ]
Are peer reviews incorporated into the self-assessment process? [Section
5.8.3]
How does the Cognizant Secretarial Officer ensure that program performance
assessments are accomplished, and any indicated corrective actions are
completed? Mechanisms could include providing a representative to
participate in assessments. [Section 4.2 .3]
How well does the self -assessment program ensure that the evaluators have
adequate knowledge and experience to conduct meaningful reviews? Based
on self-assessment reports, have adequate reviews been conducted to be
able to properly evaluate the assigned area of assessment and have the self-
assessments generated meaningful recommendations for improvement and
corrective actions? [Section 5.8 .2 and Appendix B]
Did the Field Element Manager pursue improvements to the Facility
Representative program resulti ng from self-assessments of the program?
[Sections 4.2.4 and 5.8 ]
How are the Facility Representatives kept informed on changes to their
facilities and their operating practices? [Section 5.4.4 and 5.5.6 ]
How are lessons learned from facility events disseminated to Facility
Representatives? [Section 5.5.6 and Appendix D]
How are applicable lessons learned from facility events at other DOE facilities
sought and disseminated to Facility Representatives? [Sections 5.8.4 and
Appendix D]
II.
APPROACH
The approach to be used in performing the Facility Representative Program
assessment is expected to vary between Field Elements. In order to obtain a
valuable assessment of the program, the following methodology is presented.
Documentation. Much information can be determined in advance of the
assessment by careful review of program documentation. This can include:
B-5


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc.