Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Acronyms
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-3011-2002
2. ACRONYMS
The following are key terms used in this Standard:
a.
BIO
-
Basis for Interim Operation
b.
CFR
-
Code of Federal Regulations
c.
CSO
-
Cognizant Secretarial Officer
d.
DNFSB
-
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
e.
DOE
-
Department of Energy
f.
DSA
-
Documented Safety Analysis
g.
EH
-
Office of Environment, Safety, and Health
h.
EIS
-
Environmental Impact Statement
i.
FHA
-
Fire Hazards Analysis
j
FRAM
-
Functions, Responsibilities, and Authorities Manual
k.
G
-
Guide
l.
GTN
-
Germantown
m.
HASP
-
Health and Safety Plan
n.
HAZOP
-
Hazards and Operability Study
o.
HQ
-
Headquarters
p.
NNSA
-
National Nuclear Security Administration
q.
OSR
-
Operational Safety Requirement
r.
PrHA
-
Process Hazards Analysis
s.
SAR
-
Safety Analysis Report
t.
SSC
-
Structures, Systems, and Components
u.
STD
-
Standard
v.
TECH
-
Technical Report
w.
TSR
-
Technical Safety Requirement
3. BIO FOR NUCLEAR FACILITY WITH LIMITED OPERATIONAL LIFE
A nuclear facility with a limited operational life is a nuclear facility for which there is a short
remaining operational period before ending the facility's mission. Following this there would
be periods of surveillance and maintenance, deactivation, and decommissioning. DOE G
421.1-2 defines a limited life facility as a facility with an approved deactivation plan calling
for cessation of operation within a stated period (i.e., 5 years or less). The deactivation plan
should include required funding action and plan change control to ensure relevancy.
The primary rationale for utilizing the BIO approach is that the short (i.e., normally less than
5 years) remaining operational life of the facility does not justify the increased time and cost
required to develop a DSA fully utilizing the DOE-STD-3009 methodology.
Existing information (e.g., current SAR, and supporting documentation) should be reviewed
against the listing above. Maximum advantage should be taken of pertinent existing safety
analyses and design information (i.e., requirements and their bases) that are immediately
available, or can be retrieved through reasonable efforts. Other information arises from
existing sources such as process hazards analyses (PrHAs), fire hazards analyses (FHAs),
4


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business