Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs):
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-3006-2000
Criteria Review and Approach Documents (CRADs):
CRADs are the documents used in the implementation plan to establish the depth of the ORR and
provide guidance to the ORR team members. As such, the quality of these documents will have a
significant impact on the overall quality of the ORR. CRADs are the bases used to evaluate the core
requirements of an ORR. The core requirements of an ORR include the 20 minimum core requirements
of the DOE O 425.1B, as well as any additional core requirements specific to the particular ORR. Each
core requirement is evaluated based on the criteria established. The criteria should be specific and as
objective as possible, dependent on the given situation.
The development of the CRADs is the means through which the graded approach is applied to the scope
of the ORR. Those areas significant to the startup or significant to the shutdown should be assessed to a
greater depth than other areas. For example, if in a maintenance shutdown, a system was modified or a
new system was added, the training, procedures, documentation, safety basis, etc., for that new system
should be reviewed exhaustively. Another system in that same facility that did not undergo modification
would receive a less comprehensive review. This review could be a sampling of the training and
procedures associated with the system. For example, 20 % of the qualified operators of unmodified
systems could be interviewed to assess level of knowledge, whereas the percentage could be higher for
the modified or new system. In a shutdown that was caused by a OSR/TSR violation due to a personnel
error, the training and qualification program for the facility should be assessed in detail while the
implementation of the safety basis itself would need a less comprehensive assessment. For a new, high
hazard facility, the depth of the review should be complete in all areas. For a restart of a low hazard
facility, the review should be focused on the areas significant to the startup or shutdown with the
remaining core areas addressed to a lesser extent, via a less extensive criteria. In general, the discussion
in the plan-of-action will guide the consideration that results in the level of detail in any particular review
area.
Each CRAD should begin with a core requirement or some portion of the core requirement. This will
ensure that all core requirements are addressed by criteria regardless of the approach used in developing
the criteria. The specific criteria, which address the core requirement or portion of a core requirement,
should follow and should be related clearly to these requirements. Each criterion then, is a statement of
the specific actions, or attributes, the inspector(s) use to make a judgement as to the readiness of the site,
facility, or process to operate in this specific area. The next section of the CRAD is the Review
Appendix 4-4


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business