Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Scenario of events cont'd
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Instructor's Guide
A thorough survey was conducted in the change
house, and it was discovered that, in addition to a
few articles in the change house itself, two locks and
lockers used by Employee No. 1 (who performed the
pigtail changes on the previous shift) were
contaminated. This employee returned to work at
1830 on August 23, 1991. Surveys of the locker
contents indicated contamination on company-
issued clothing worn the previous shift. The
employee was also found to have skin
contamination of 6500 dpm/100 cm2 on the arm,
4500 dpm/100 cm2 on the knee, and 2750 dpm/100
cm2 on each ankle.
A survey of the employee's coworker's (Employee
No. 2) locker revealed contaminated items (both
Show OT 16.3.
company-issued and personal). Personal surveys
conducted when Employee No. 2 returned to work
showed the presence of skin contamination of 4500
dpm/100 cm2 on hair, 5000 dpm/100 cm2 on neck,
and 40,000 and 15,000 dpm/100 cm2 on wrists.
Later (2130 hours on August 23 for Employee No. 2,
and 1900 hours on August 24 for Employee No. 1)
Show OT 16.4.
surveys were conducted at the employees' homes.
Monitoring of one employee's home found one
T-shirt and one pillowcase slightly contaminated. A
pair of shoes at the other employee's home was
found slightly contaminated. This employee's (No.
2) coveralls had already been sent to the laundry,
since it was not recognized they were contaminated.
Show OT 16.5.
After laundering, significant contamination was still
present (up to levels of 250,000 dpm/100 cm2 at
ankles, and lower levels at other places). A survey
of the laundry equipment did not indicate any
contamination.
Based on statements from the involved employees,
they utilized the required personal protective
Some area designations have
clothing and equipment for the job at the time. The
changed since 1991 (e.g.,
Contamination Zone).
autoclave area is designated as a Contamination
Zone. Anti-contamination clothing designated for
"Anti-contamination clothing" is
cylinder changes at the time of the incident
another term for "protective
consisted of company-issued coveralls (blues),
clothing."
gloves, and shoe scuffs. Operational procedures
require the use of a respirator when disconnecting
Module 16 4


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business