Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Hazard Evaluation
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-1120-2005/Vol. 1
characterization activities (e.g., sampling and analysis) should be determined based on the
collection and evaluation of facility information, the remaining level of uncertainty regarding
existing hazardous substances (i.e., radiological materials, hazardous chemicals, or hazardous
wastes), and the existing facility condition. Consider characterization activities if there is
insufficient knowledge of hazards to understand the hazardous substance types, quantities,
forms, potential exposures, and locations.
4.2.1.2
Hazard Evaluation
This subsection should present the approach used to identify and evaluate hazards, including
hazard evaluation techniques and methods used to qualitatively estimate accident consequences
and likelihood. Ranking or binning schemes applied to hazardous events should also be
described, and where used, should be considerate of all receptors (i.e., public, onsite personnel,
and facility workers). An example of risk binning guidelines is presented in Appendix E that
may be applied to environmental restoration projects. A discussion of hazard evaluation
methods appropriate for environmental restoration can be found in Chapters 4 and 5 of
Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation, prepared by the Center for Chemical Process Safety of the
American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
4.2.2
Hazard Analysis Results
The results of hazard identification and analysis efforts should be presented in this section of the
DSA. The format and guidance provided in Section 3.3.2 of DOE-STD-3009-94 should be
followed and should be inclusive of subsections related to hazard identification, categorization
and evaluation. Additional considerations for environmental restoration are presented below.
Hazard analysis activities that support Subpart B requirements of Part 830, as well as
HAZWOPER and other directives and regulations, may be integrated. This is a recommended
practice that is discussed in DOE-HDBK-1063-2003, Integration of Multiple Hazard Analysis
Requirements and Activities. Integration supports a common baseline of hazards information
and assumptions and encourages communication between various safety, environmental, security
and operations personnel.
4.2.2.1
Hazard Identification and Categorization
Environmental restoration activities typically involve radioactive or hazardous materials (i.e.,
hazardous substances, wastes or other constituents) that may be distributed unevenly over a large
area. The cumulative total of material inventory will often exceed HC3 threshold quantities
because of the large area being considered. However, waste materials or contamination is buried
in the ground at many of these sites and not subject to dispersive forces until exhumed, or
exhumed material may not be readily dispersible due to physical form or the method of
extraction. These activities are likely candidates to be downgraded below HC3 based on a
simple qualitative hazard analysis and final hazard categorization.
The Hazard Categorization process uses the total inventory in the project or project segment (if
segmentation is used in accordance with DOE-STD-1027-92) to categorize the environmental
restoration project. Soil, surface and groundwater contaminants are typically described in terms
4-4


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business