Natural Phenomena Hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for Department of Energy

• Natural Phenomena Hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for Department of Energy
• This document has been reproduced from the best available copy.
• Foreword
• The Department of Energy (DOE) has issued DOE
• The design and evaluation criteria presented herein control the level
• Table of Contents
• Table of Contents - Continued
• Table of Contents - Continued
• Table of Contents - Continued
• Chapter 1. Inroduction
• The following national consensus codes and standards
• The following national consensus codes and standards - Continued
• Figure 1-1. Natural Phenomena Design Input
• Overview of the NPH Design and Evaluation Criteria
• Evaluation of Existing Facilities
• Quality Assurance and Peer Review
• References
• References - Continued
• Chapter 2. Earthquake Design and Evaluation Criteria
• Figure 2-1. DOE-STD-1020 Combines Probabilistic and Deterministic Methods
• Figure 2-2.  Earthquake Input Excitation is Defined by Maximum Ground Acceleration
• Table 2-1 Seismic Performance Categories and Seismic Hazard Exceedance Levels
• General Approach for Seismic Design and Evaluation
• Seismic Design and Evaluation of Structures, Systems, and Components
• Seismic Design and Evaluation of Structures, Systems, and Components - Continued
• Figure 2-3. DOE Seismic Design and Evaluation Procedure
• Performance Category 1 and 2 Structures, Systems, and Components.
• Figure 2-4. Example Design/Evaluation Earthquake Ground Motion Response Spectrum
• Performance Category 3 and 4 Structures, Systems, and Components
• Performance Category 3 and 4 Structures, Systems, and Components - Continued
• Performance Category 3 and 4 Structures, Systems, and Components - Continued
• Damping Values for Performance Category 3 and 4 Structures, Systems, and Components
• Damping Values for Performance Category 3 and 4 Structures, Systems, and Components - Continued
• Table 2-2 Specified Damping Values
• Table 2-3 Inelastic Energy Absorption Factors, F
• Additional Requirements
• Seismic Anchor Motion
• Anchorage and Supports
• Evaluation of Existing Facilities
• Evaluation of Existing Facilities - Continued
• Table 2-4 Suggested Priortization Scheme*
• Model Building Groups
• Summary of Seismic Provisions
• Table 2-5 Summary of Earthquake Evaluation Provisions
• References
• References - Continued
• Chapter 3. Wind Design and Evaluation Criteria
• Wind Design Criteria
• Table 3-1 Summary Of Minimum Wind Design Criteria
• Table 3-2 Recommended Peak Gust Wind Speeds for Straight Winds
• Performance Category 1
• Straight Winds and Hurricanes
• Table 3-3 Recommended Straight Wind Missile Barriers for Performance Categories 3 and 4
• Tornadoes
• Tornadoes - Continued
• Table 3-4 Recommended Tornado Missile Barriers * for Performance Category 3
• Performance Category 4
• Table 3-5 Recommended Tornado Missile Barriers for Performance Category 4
• Design Guidelines
• Data Collection
• Comparison of Postulated Failures with Performance Goals
• References
• References - Continued
• Chapter 4. Flood Design and Evaluation Criteria
• Table 4-1 Flood Criteria Summary
• Table 4-2 Design Basis Flood Events
• Flood Evaluation Process
• Figure 4-1 Flood Evaluation Process
• Evaluation for Local Precipitation
• Flood Design Strategies
• Flood Design Strategies - Continued
• Flood Design Criteria
• Performance Category 2
• Performance Category 4
• Design Requirements
• Flood Protection and Emergency Operations Plans
• Considerations for Existing Construction
• Probabilistic Flood Risk Assessment
• References
• References - Continued
• Appendix A: Terminology and Definitions
• Performance Goal
• Figure A-1 Example Probabilistic Natural Phenomena Hazard Curve
• Appendix B: Commentary on General NPH Design and Evaluation Criteria
• NPH Design and Evaluation Philosophy
• Graded Approach, Performance Goals, and Performance Categories
• Graded Approach, Performance Goals, and Performance Categories - Continued
• Table B-1 Structure, System, or Component (SSC) NPH Performance Goals for Various
• Table B-2 Comparison of Performance Categories from Various Sources
• Evaluation of Existing Facilities
• Evaluation of Existing Facilities - Continued
• Figure B-2 Evaluation Approach for an Existing SSC
• References
• References - Continued
• Appendix C: Commentary on Earthquake Design and Evaluation Criteria
• Table C-1 Structure, System, or Component (SSC)
• Table C-2 Qualitative Seismic Performance Goals
• Historical Perspective Since Early Development Using Uniform Building Code Criteria
• Figure C-2 Performance Goal Achievement
• Table C-3Seismic Performance Goals & Specified Seismic Hazard Probabilities
• Current Status
• Influence of Seismic Scale Factor
• Influence of Seismic Scale Factor - Continued
• Influence of Seismic Scale Factor - Continued
• Seismic Design/Evaluation Input
• Seismic Design/Evaluation Input - Continued
• Figure C-3 Earthquake Input Excitation is Defined by Maximum Ground
• Earthquake Hazard Annual Exceedance Probabilities
• Earthquake Ground Motion Response Spectra
• DBE Response Spectra at High Frequencies
• Figure C-5 Spectral Acceleration in the High Frequency Region
• Effective Peak Ground Motion
• Evaluation of Seismic Demand (Response)
• Figure C-6 Earthquake Provision Basic Approach
• Table C- 4 General Description of Earthquake Provisions
• Dynamic Seismic Analysis
• Static Force Method of Seismic Analysis
• Soil-Structure Interaction
• Soil-Structure Interaction - Continued
• Foundation Input Motion
• Dynamic analysis of the coupled soil-structure system.
• Analytical Treatment of Energy Dissipation and Absorption
• Inelastic Behavior
• Inelastic Behavior - Continued
• Inelastic Behavior - Continued
• Inelastic Behavior - Continued
• Inelastic Behavior - Continued
• Guidance on Estimating the Inelastic Energy Absorption Factor, F
• Introduction
• Figure C-7 Three Story Shear Wall Structure
• Table C-5 Elastic Response to Reference 1.0g NUREG/CR-0098 Spectrum (7% damping)
• Table C-5 Elastic Response to Reference 1.0g NUREG/CR-0098 Spectrum (7% damping) - Continued
• Table C-5 Elastic Response to Reference 1.0g NUREG/CR-0098 Spectrum (7% damping) - Continued
• Capacity Approach
• Seismic Design and Detailing
• Configuration
• Continuous and Redundant Load Paths
• Tying Elements Together
• Special Considerations for Systems and Components
• General
• General - Continued
• Seismic Interaction
• Special Considerations for Existing Facilities
• Special Considerations for Existing Facilities - Continued
• Quality Assurance and Peer Review
• Performance Categories 1, 2, 3, and 4
• Alternate Seismic Mitigation Measures
• Seismic Base Isolation
• References
• References - Continued
• References - Continued
• References - Continued
• References - Continued
• References - Continued
• Appendix D: Commentary on Wind Design and Evaluation Criteria
• Tornado Hazard Assessment
• Table D-1 Examples of Similar Damage from Straight Winds, Hurricanes, and Tornadoes
• Figure D-1 Straight Wind and Tornado Regions of Wind Hazard Curves
• Table D-2 Ratio of Hazard Probabilities to Performance Goal Probabilities
• Windborne Missiles
• Windborne Missiles - Continued
• References
• Appendix E: Effects of Natural Phenomena Hazards
• Effects of Earthquakes
• Effects of Earthquakes - Continued
• Effects of Wind
• Table E-1 F-Scale Classification of Tornadoes Based on Damage (Ref. E-2)
• Wind Pressures
• Additional Adverse Effects of Tornadoes
• Effects of Flooding
• Table E-2 Causes of Flooding
• Flooding Damage
• Table E-3 Flood Damage Summary
• References
• Concluding Material
• Blank Page
• Blank Page
• Blank Page
• Blank Page
• Blank Page
• Blank Page

Natural Phenomena Hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for Department of Energy

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us