Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Comparison of Postulated Failures with Performance Goals
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-1020-2002
missiles. Each event in the sequence can be associated with a wind speed. All obvious
damage sequences should be examined for progressive failure.
3.3.4
Comparison of Postulated Failures with Performance Goals
Once the postulated failure sequences are identified, the SSC performance is compared
with the stated performance goals for the specified Performance Category. The general SSC
evaluation procedures described in Appendix B(Figure B-2) are followed. If an SSC is able
to survive wind speeds associated with the performance goal, the SSC meets the goal. If the
performance criteria are not met, then the assumptions and methods of analyses can be
modified to eliminate conservatism introduced in the evaluation methods. The acceptable
hazard probability levels can be raised slightly, if the SSC comes close to meeting the
performance goals. Otherwise, various means of retrofit should be examined. Several
options are listed below, but the list is not exhaustive:
(a) Add x-bracing or shear walls to obtain additional lateral load resisting capacity
(b) Modify connections in steel, timber or pre-stressed concrete construction to permit
them to transfer moment, thus increasing lateral load resistance in structural frames
(c) Brace a relatively weak structure against a more substantial one
(d) Install tension ties that run from roof to foundation to improve roof anchorage
(e) Provide x-bracing in the plane of a roof to improve diaphragm stiffness and thus
achieve a better distribution of lateral load to rigid frames, braced frames or shear
walls.
To prevent breach of structure envelope or to reduce the consequences of missile
perforation, the following general suggestions are presented:
(a) Install additional fasteners to improve cladding anchorage
(b) Provide interior barriers around sensitive equipment or rooms containing hazardous
materials
(c) Eliminate windows or cover them with missile-resistant grills
(d) Erect missile resistant barriers in front of doors and windows
(e) Replace ordinary overhead doors with heavy-duty ones that will resist the design
wind loads and missile impacts. The door tracks must also be able to resist the
wind loads.
3-15


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business