|
| DOE-STD-1020-2002
Table 2-5 Summary of Earthquake Evaluation Provisions
Performance Category (PC)
1
2
3
4
(MCE) G.M.2
(MCE) G. M.2
1x10-4
4x10-4
Hazard Exceedance
Probability, PH
(1x10-3)1
(2x10-4)1
Response Spectra
Median amplification
(no conservative bias)
Damping for
5%
Table 2-3
Structural Evaluation
Acceptable Analysis
Static or dynamic force method
Dynamic analysis
Approaches for
normalized to code level base
Structures
shear
Analysis approaches for
IBC Force equation for
Dynamic analysis using in-
systems and components
equipment and non-structural
structure response spectra
elements (or more rigorous
(Damping from Table 2-2)
approach)
Seismic Use group
Seismic Use
Seismic Use
Not used
Group I
Group III
Load Factors
Code specified load factors
Load factors of unity
appropriate for structural
material
Scale Factors
Not Used
SF = 0.9
SF = 1.25
Inelastic Energy
Accounted for by R in IBC 2000
F from Table 2-3 by which
Absorption Ratios
elastic response is reduced to
account for permissible inelastic
For Structures
behavior
Material Strength
Minimum specified or 95% non-exceedance in-situ values
Structural Capacity
Code ultimate strength or
Code ultimate strength or
allowable behavior level
limit-state level
Quality Assurance
Required within a graded approach (i.e., with increasing rigor
Program
ranging from the IBC requirements from PC-1 to nuclear power
plant requirements for PC-4)
Peer Review
Not Required
Required within a graded approach (i.e., with
increasing rigor ranging from IBC requirements
from PC-2 to nuclear power plant requirements for
PC-4)
1
For sites such as LLNL, SNL-Livermore, SLAC, LBNL, & ETEC which are near tectonic plate boundaries.
2
MCE GM = Maximum considered earthquake ground motion (generally, PH = 4x10-4 ) - for Seismic Use Group I
(PC-1) use 2/3 MCE, for Seismic Group III (PC-2) use 2/3 MCE with importance Factor of 1.5.
2-26
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |