Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Wind Design Criteria
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-1020-2002
3.2
Wind Design Criteria
The criteria presented herein meet or exceed the target performance goals described in
DOE O 420.1 for each Performance Category. SSCs in each category have a different role and
represent different levels of hazard to people and the environment. In addition, the degree of
wind hazard varies geographically. Facilities in the same Performance Category, but at different
geographical locations, will have different wind speeds specified to achieve the same
performance goal.
The minimum wind design criteria for each Performance Category are summarized in
Table 3-1. The recommended basic wind speeds for straight wind, hurricanes and tornadoes are
contained in Table 3-2 for non-reactor nuclear and other hazardous facilities, reservations, and
production facilities. All wind speeds are 3 second gust, which is consistent with the ASCE 7
approach. Importance factors as given in ASCE 7 should be used where applicable.
Degrees of conservatism are introduced in the design process by means of load
combinations. The combinations are given in the appropriate material national consensus design
standard. Designers will need to exercise judgment in choosing the most appropriate
combinations in some situations. Designs or evaluations shall be based on the load combination
causing the most unfavorable effect. For PC-3 and 4 the load combination to be used should
invoke either wind or tornado depending on which speed is specified in Table 3-2.
Most loads, other than dead loads, vary significantly with time. When these variable
loads are combined with dead loads, their combined effect could be sufficient to reduce the risk
of unsatisfactory performance to an acceptably low level. When more than one variable load is
considered, it is unlikely that they will all attain their maximum value at the same time.
Accordingly, some reduction in the total of the combined load effects is appropriate. This
reduction is accomplished through load combination multiplication factors as given in the
appropriate material national consensus standard.
3-2


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business