Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Table 6.2. Tissue Weighing Factors
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-1128-98
Guide of Good Practices for Occupational Radiological Protection in Plutonium Facilities
where
= tissue weighing factor for the relevant organ or tissue T
wT
= absorbed dose in the tissue or organ of interest
DT
= the quality factor averaged over the tissue or organ of interest.
QT
The weighing factors are given in Table 6.2, which is taken from 10 CFR 835 (DOE,
1998a). Effective dose equivalent has the benefit that it is additive, and internal and external
radiations can be added numerically to drive an overall estimate of risk.
Table 6.2. Tissue Weighing Factors
Tissue or Organ
Tissue Weighing Factor, wT
Gonads
0.25
Breast
0.15
Bone marrow (red)
0.12
Lungs
0.12
Thyroid
0.03
Bone surfaces
0.03
Remainder(a)
0.30
Whole body(b)
1.00
(a)
Remainder means the five other organs or tissues with the highest dose
(e.g., liver, kidney, spleen, thymus, adrenal, pancreas, stomach, small
intestine, and upper large intestine). The weighing factor for each
remaining organ is 0.06.
(b)
For the case of uniform external irradiation of the whole body, a
weighing factor equal to 1 may be used in determining the effective
dose equivalent.
The methodology of ICRP Publication 26 (ICRP, 1977) has been incorporated into 10 CFR
835 (DOE, 1998a), and into the standard, Radiological Control (DOE, 1999a). The annual
radiation dose limits for DOE and its contractors are presented in Table 6.3.
However, DOE contractors usually establish lower annual administrative control levels,
typically 500 mrem/year.
In practice, it is very difficult to measure the effective dose equivalents specified in
Table 6.3 because it is necessary to know not only the type of radiation but also its energy
and direction. If the flux, energy, and direction of incidence are known, it is possible to
calculate effective dose equivalent using fluence to effective dose equivalent conversion
coefficients presented in ICRP Publication 51 (ICRP, 1987), which presents the effective
dose equivalent as a function of energy for various irradiation geometries. Conversion
coefficients for monodirectional beams of neutrons can be found in an article by Stewart et
al. (1994). Conversion coefficients for photons in various irradiation geometries, including
planar sources, can be found in a report by the Zankl et al. (1994). This will provide more
6-3


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business