Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Adequate coverage for DOE facilities.
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-1063-2000
What continuing training is conducted for Facility Representatives? Does it
cover topics germane to FacRep duties and responsibilities?
2. Adequate coverage for DOE facilities.
Is FacRep Staffing in accordance with this standard? If not, is a written
agreement with the Program Office in place?
What is done to recruit and hire satisfactory candidates to fill known or
projected FacRep vacancies? Are sufficient numbers of FacRep candidates
undergoing qualification to fill known or projected FacRep vacancies? Is
there a FacRep "pipeline" to train new FacRep candidates?
How long have current FacRep vacancies existed?
What is the trend of the reported time spent in the facility and time
performing oversight?
What methods are used by the Field Element to ensure that adequate facility
coverage is maintained by qualified FacRep during periods of leave, attrition,
or downsizing?
3. Effective relationships with the Contractor.
Do FacReps actually have unencumbered access and "Stop Work" authority to
their assigned facilities? Has this been communicated formally to the
contractor?
Has "Stop Work" authority been exercised? Was it appropriate? Was it
effective? Are there occasions when it was appropriate for Facility
Representatives to exercise "Stop Work" authority, but it was not used?
What is the effectiveness of the FacReps as verified by observing selected
qualified personnel who are monitoring training, operations, or maintenance
evolutions?
Are reviews of occurrence reports accomplished in a timely manner while
ensuring that the root cause has been determined and effective action
proposed?
Do FacReps accomplish facility assessments, surveillances and audits as
scheduled and are the findings meaningful and consistent with facility
performance? Do assessments limit the amount of time the FacRep can
spend on day-to-day facility oversight?
How effective is the process for correcting deficiencies when comparing
reported dates against the completed action dates? Have all completed
actions actually been performed?
How is tracking, follow-up, and closure of FacRep findings performed? Is
there follow-up on issues informally identified by the FacRep?
How effective is the documentation of FacRep activities (e.g., reports, log
keeping)?
B-3


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business