Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Air Monitoring cont'd
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-HDBK-1184-2004
If large non-respirable tritiated particulates are captured on an air filter, intake
amounts are somewhat overestimated. However, non-respirable particulates are
not efficiently suspended in breathable air and are therefore discriminated against
during air monitoring. Also, some dissolution can occur in the scintillation cocktail,
which measures the activity captured on a filter. Dissolved tritium is not subject to
self-absorption. Intake calculations are therefore overestimated if all activity
observed by LSC is taken as "insoluble" and treated as Type S particulate. Since
SAFs vary by a factor of ~10, dissolution in cocktail will not increase intake
computations by more than a factor of ~10. Either non-respirable particulate
collection or dissolution in cocktail will act to provide overestimation of intake (and
ultimately dose) from air monitoring results.
Intake (and dose rate) in this case may be expressed as follows:
D(t) ∝ Io + ∆Io
(Eq. 5-8)
where:
D(t) = dose rate to lung from observed intake at time t
Io = observed intake to lung from air monitoring results at time zero
∆Io = incremental observed activity from particle dissolution or non-
respirable particulates at time zero.
Shortfalls
The main shortfalls associated with this methodology for intake (and dose)
estimation are: 1) actual activity intakes are uncertain by a factor of 10 because of
self-absorption. 2) activity collected and measured on filters may over-represent
the intake because of capture of non-respirable particulates and dissolution in
scintillation cocktail.
As previously discussed in this handbook, intakes in terms of actual activity do not
need to be determined. Intakes of observed activity are adequate to provide dose
estimates as long as dose conversion factors are available which are described in
terms of observed activity. In Section 5.2.3, self-absorption is investigated in
detail. The section shows that actual activity of an intake is underrepresented by
the observed results from scintillation counting of an air filter sample, but that the
actual activity is correspondingly not fully available to impart dose to lung tissue. In
fact, the observed activity more nearly represents dose or dose potential, since only
that beta radiation that is not self-absorbed and escapes the particulate (i.e., that
beta radiation "observed" via LSC analysis) is available to impart dose.
In Section 5.2.4, the ICRP 66 lung model is used to tabulate dose conversion
factors for a given actual intake of tritiated particulate of various materials and
various particle size distributions, assuming an ICRP 78 biokinetic model and
Absorption Type S (slow). ICRP 66 dose, which does not account for self-
absorption, is corrected by a "self-absorption factor for energy" (SAFe) for the
various particulates to determine the actual dose from the actual intake. SAFe is
the fraction of the total tritium beta energy generated within a particulate which is
released from that particulate. The tritium beta activity expected to be observed in
LSC analysis from the actual intake is then determined using the "self-absorption
factor for beta particles" (SAF) for the various particulates. The result of these
33


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business