Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Hazard Analysis
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-1120-2005/Vol. 2
HAZARD ANALYSIS
Example 5:
Final Hazard Categorization of Environmental Restoration Activity
A former active disposal site that was operated from 1943 to 1970 is currently planned for soil excavation
and offsite disposal. The area consists of 15 acres. Burning and disposal of debris, including radioactive
wastes from Y-12 are known to have occurred within unlined trenches that were eventually covered with
soil.
Soil and groundwater sample results from remedial and field investigations were used to estimate a 95
percent upper confidence level of radioactive material inventory. A preliminary hazard categorization
was performed in accordance with DOE-STD-1027-92 and considered the sum of multiple radionuclide
fractions to their respective threshold quantity values. This concluded that inventory was 49 times higher
than the threshold for Hazard Category 3 (HC3) and 90% of the Hazard Category 2 thresholds.
Therefore, the site was initially categorized as HC3.
A simple hazard evaluation was prepared and documented, which considered the presence of available
energy sources (e.g., fires, vehicle collisions, impacts from aircraft crash, high winds, localized flooding).
No dispersive mechanisms were identified to exist, except when material was exhumed in preparation for
transport via dump trucks which exposed material to several release mechanisms. The maximum quantity
of material expected to be removed at any one time was limited because of excavation capabilities and the
number of dump trucks that could physically transport materials.
The credible release fractions for each event were determined using DOE-HDBK-3010-94. These values
were then compared with the bounding release fraction from DOE-STD-1027-92, which is 1E-3, and a
ratio of the two numbers calculated. The release fraction of 1E-3 is used as a basis for Hazard Category 2
determinations in DOE-STD-1027-02 for non-volatile solids, powders and liquids, and was also
confirmed to be the baseline value in EPA Technical Background document that supported Hazard
Category 3 threshold quantities. Any decrease in this release fraction will result in an increase in the
DOE-STD-1027 TQ value, proportional to the ratio mentioned above.
The most limiting release fraction was associated with a vehicle accident and was modeled after a free-
fall spill of powder in accordance with DOE-HDBK-3010 (Airborne Release Fraction of 2E-03 and
Respirable Fraction of 0.3). This value is 60% of the baseline value, and for the sum of all isotopes in
question results in a total adjusted HC3 TQ of approximately 7.0 curies. The inventory of one dump
truck is estimated at 0.074 Ci (20yd3) of mixed isotopes. Over 90 dump trucks would need to
B-7


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business