Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Table 5 -6. Categories and Performance Criteria for Uranium Bioassay
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-1136-2004
Guide of Good Practices for Occupational Radiological Protection in Uranium Facilities
magnitude would not be detected if it occurred immediately after a bioassay measurement and if it were
eliminated from the body at such a rate that nothing was detected during the next scheduled
measurement. The dose resulting from such an intake would be the MDD for that particular measurement
technique and frequency.
Estimates of MDD in terms of CEDE should be documented for each measurement technique,
Minimum Detectable Activity (MDA), and frequency. The MDA is defined in ANSI/HPS N13.30 (ICRP
Publication 1996) as a measure of the detection limit. Analytical radiobioassay laboratories should meet the
Acceptable MDAs (AMDAs) recommended in ANSI N13.30 as a minimum. The AMDAs for U bioassay
are shown in Table 5-6.
Table 5 -6. Categories and Performance Criteria for Uranium Bioassay
Direct Bioassay
AMDA(a)
CATEGORY
ORGAN
234
Measurement of
Th
Lung
3 nCi*
235
U
Measurement of
Lung
0.2 nCi
238
U.
* Based on 10 mg
Indirect Bioassay
AMDA(a)
CATEGORY
NUCLIDE
234
U, 235U,
238
U
Alpha (Urine)
0.1 pCi/L
Isotope specific measurements
Mass determination
Uranium (natural)
5 g/L
(a)
Note: The "Acceptable MDAs (AMDAs)" were removed from later drafts of the ANSI standard due to possible
misinterpretation of the word "acceptable". The AMDAs have been replaced with test ranges for externally
conducted quality control tests that take into consideration the need to be several times MDA or more before
reasonably low coefficients of variation can be obtained for individual sample measurements. In this way, bias as
well as precision can be estimated from reasonably small samples within each test category.
Retention functions specific to the various chemical forms and particle size distributions found in the
facility should be used. Examples of MDD tabulations can be found in La Bone et al. (1993) and
Carbaugh et al. (1994). In establishing MDD tables, it is important to consider dose contributions from all
appropriate radionuclides in any mixture, rather than just the dose contribution from the bioassay
indicator nuclide.
The minimum frequency for routine bioassay programs is interrelated to action levels, as specified in
Table 5-7 (ANSI/HPS 1995). Special bioassays are taken as needed.
5-15


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business