| 
 | ||||||||||
| 
 |  DOE-STD -3009-94 of such preventive or mitigative functions (e.g., electrical power sources for ventilation). The total layers of defense in depth available are also key considerations in designating safety-significant SSCs. If many effective barriers are available, the significance of any one barrier is lim ited. If only one or two barriers can be realistically counted on, their individual significance increases. Likewise, if total hazardous material inventory is distributed over a hundred containers (e.g., waste drum storage pad, plutonium storage vault), the failure of any one container does not necessarily constitute a major uncontrolled hazardous material release, depending on the nature of the material and the design adequacy of the container. If all material is held in one container (e.g., 3000 gallon hydrogen fluoride storage tank), the failure of that container is of major concern in controlling the release of hazardous material. In the case where quantities of hazardous materials are being stored so that breached nuclear material storage packages might result from facility accident conditions, the containers themselves may need to be upgraded or another facility level method (secondary containment or confinement) considered for defense- in- depth. A principle reason for designating such major features as safety-significant SSCs is that they typically represent facility specific systems as opposed to more generic systems. While all glovebox line facilities use zone systems of ventilation for confinement, there is an enormous variation in the DOE comple x with regard to specific design parameters such as number and types of exhaust systems, means of flow control, etc. Accordingly, more detailed descriptions of such equipment in a DSA is considered both appropriate and necessary for Hazard Category 2 facilities. Such description would not provide the same utility for relatively generic confinement items such as 55- gallon waste drums. The need for designation as a safety-significant SSC would also be superseded if that SSC was designated as a safety-class SSC in accident analysis. TSRs Summarize those safety-significant SSCs, SACs and other aspects of defense in depth that require TSR coverage. The scope of the TSR coverage is determined by the degree to which barriers or the facility-safety basis are seriously challenged. Vital, passive components such as piping, vessels, supports, structures, and containers would typically be considered design features. These components are discussed in the Design Features Section of the TSR document. For example, a glovebox is an obvious barrier to uncontrolled material release. The windows, gloves, and cable/piping connectors are all necessary to maintain the barrier, but do not specifically require operational limits or administrative controls as contributors to defense in depth. DOE G 423.1-1 provides basic screening criteria to identify defense-in-depth Page 40 | 
| 
 Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |