Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Air Line Rupture
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-HDBK-3010-94
7.0 Application Examples; Feed Preparation Example
holdup issues would arise. Accordingly, the phenomena can be considered bounded
by impact of contaminated non-combustible solids. The ARF and RF assigned are
1E-3 and 1.0 (subsection 5.3.3.2.2). The maximum initial respirable source term is:
1050 g * 1.0 * 1E-3 * 1.0 = 1.0 g
D. Air Line Rupture. Given that the air line is equipped with a flow-restricting
orifice and the ventilation system is normally operating, the event is expected to be
insignificant. For the purposes of example, it will be assumed that when the line
breaks, more flow is attained and/or ventilation flow is secured for whatever reason.
Even in these circumstances, the only obvious effect would be limited contamination
release from glovebox-mounted HEPA filters due to reverse flow. The break would
have to occur in close proximity to powder to significantly affect any in-line material.
The most powder that can be exposed at any one location is 2000 g, the maximum
quantity procedurally allowed at any one station. This material can be exposed
powder in the loading pan at the furnace or at the weighing and batching station,
although less material is typically handled. A maximum of 1000 g of plutonium as
contamination on residue can be exposed at the impactor station as well. This
material is not as susceptible to release as loose powder. For example, plutonium on
magnesium oxide crucible residues may be literally embedded in crucible pores.
Treating it like a loose, powdery surface contamination is extremely conservative.
If the air line does not break in close proximity to exposed material, all the material
in the glovebox is affected by the overall glovebox phenomena, and the DR for this
phenomena is 1.0. If the break is in close proximity to one batch (assume the batch
in the furnace pan), the DR is 0.4 for this material (2000/5000) and 0.6 for the
different phenomenological effect on the remaining material.
For the expected case where no material is in close proximity to the break and air
flow from the pipe, the phenomena is certainly bounded by aerodynamic resuspension
of powder exposed to normal ventilation flow. The ARF and RF assigned are
4E-5/hr and 1.0 (subsection 4.4.4.1). The maximum initial respirable source term is:
5000 g * 1.0 * 4E-5/hr * 1.0 = 0.2 g/hr
If the break occurred in close proximity to the furnace storage station (within ~ 30 to
40 cm), the 0.21 MPag flow could cause an effect more vigorous than simple
resuspension. The effect of any typical air line pressure (e.g., up to 0.7 MPag) would
be to produce some small level of pressurization in the glovebox and accelerated
Page 7-9


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business