|
| DOE-HDBK-3010-94
4.0 Solids; Powders
surface from the atmosphere. Suspension is defined as the entrainment of particles on the
surface from nonatmospheric processes. The term resuspension is used to cover both
processes since, once the material is entrained, it is not possible to distinguish the behavior
of material generated by either process. For soil, the pollutant particles are attached to the
host particles. The data are insufficient to validate deposition, resuspension, diffusion and
transport deposition and airborne plume models.
Soil transport was extensively covered. Various equations are available to estimate soil loss
predominantly for agricultural purposes and are not particularly relevant here. Models based
upon wind stresses on individual soil particles are subject to formidable uncertainties when
required to integrate over the entire surface area. Due to the uncertainty as to the
applicability of these models, direct measurements of resuspension are preferred.
Table 4-19 lists some factors that may influence outdoor resuspension from soil. Not all
these factors are operative in any given situation and some factors may dominate in certain
regimes. The range of published resuspension factors for various aerodynamic and
mechanical stresses are shown in Figure 4-22 from Sehmel (1980) and are the same as shown
in Tables 4-16 and 4-17. Although shown together, it is difficult to compare the listed
values due to the differences in conditions and measurement techniques.
4.4.4.1.2 Experimentally Measured Resuspension Rates. Sehmel and Lloyd
(1976) reported the results of a 4-month study of the resuspension of a submicrom diameter
tracer from a lightly vegetated soil surface due to ambient wind stresses. An aqueous slurry
of submicron sized calcium molybdate stabilized with a surfactant was sprayed on the
surface of a lightly vegetated area in a circle with a 22.9-m radius on the Hanford site. The
surface roughness height was 34 mm. The average concentration over the area was 0.63 g
molybdenum/m2. Material resuspended were sampled by the arrangement shown
schematically in Figure A.37a using sampler as shown in Figure A.37b that aligned the
sampler inlet with flow. During the first two test periods (10/2/73 to 11/4/73 and 11/16/73
to 12/16/73) only one sampler was used at each height and all samplers operated
continuously. During the third test period (1/16/74 to 2/8/74), the sampling arrangement
was as shown in Figure A.34 and a single sampler at each height turned on automatically for
three velocity ranges (1.3 to 3.6 m/s, 3.6 to 5.8 m/s, and >5.8 m/s). The maximum
recorded gust during these periods was 20.1 m/s (45 mph). Samples were not taken during
periods of precipitation. The sampler inlet were isokinetic for a windspeed of 0.52 m/s.
Corrections for anisokinetic sampling are difficult to estimate for the continuous sampling
and are at least an order of magnitude less than the measured levels.
Resuspension rates for the test conditions were of the order of 4E-5/hr to 4E-7/hr. The
proper application required an equation that continuously depletes the source since there are
Page 4-96
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |