Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Table A.22. Comparison Between Exploding Wire Aerosol and Droplet Fume in Liquid Suspension
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-HDBK-3010-94
Appendix A. Source Data
Table A.22. Comparison Between Exploding Wire Aerosol and Droplet Fume in Liquid
Suspension
(Table III - Carter and Stewart September 1970)
(1)
Notes:
Fraction Pu in suspension by centrifuge.
(2)
o
Fume from droplets at 660 C.
Table A.23. Summary of Source Fractions Involved in Aerosol Formation
(Table IV - Carter and Stewart September 1970)
Notes: (a) Geometric mean.
(b) 95% confidence limit.
(1) Massive U does not melt after ignition unless there is an external heat supply.
Heat losses cause self extinguishing unless some form of insulation (oxide) is
present.
(2) Height of fall approximately 0.75 m.
Page A-21


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business