Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Internal Evaluations
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-HDBK-1201-97
Level I:
Reaction-
Determines the trainees' opinion of the training program.
Level II:
Learning-
Measures the trainees' achievement of the program goals.
Level III:
Application-
Determines if trainees are using the new skills on the job.
Level IV:
Results-
Measures whether training has a significant influence on the
organization's operation.
Internal Evaluations
Levels I and II focus primarily on internal evaluations. Internal evaluation is the process that
collects data by reviewing course materials, trainee test and performance data, the trainees'
reactions to training, instructor evaluations by training staff, and other information coming
from the development and use of the actual training program itself.
Measuring the trainees' reactions to training is usually collected on an end-of-course critique
form or questionnaire that records the trainees' impressions about the instructors, course
content, materials, facilities, etc. Although this data is subjective, it can be valuable as a
quick assessment of training. This data can also be a source of information about the
perceived quality of training and materials. Trainees can also be good evaluators of
instructor technical competence. The problem with this instrument is that there is very little
correlation between how the trainees feel and what they have learned. Examples 6 and 7
are variations of this type.
Instructors are evaluated by the training staff to determine the adequacy of training delivery.
This evaluation should be performed by the training supervisor or a qualified staff member.
Instructors should be evaluated regularly in terms of technical knowledge, presentation
skills, and interpersonal skills for each training setting they are qualified to instruct. The
discrepancies identified in these evaluations should be corrected using a systematic method
such as a feedback loop. Examples 1, 2, 3, 9, and 10 all relate to this method of
evaluation.
2


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business