Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Part A- Comments - Continued
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-1024-92
The assumption of lognormality does not necessarily apply to all the sites in
the EUS. In particular, the divergence is maximum for some sites strongly
affected by seismic source areas with large upper magnitude cutoff. Ground
motion expert 5 tends to increase this effect in the LLNL study. Figure 1 (not
shown here), taken from the LLNL., 1989 study, shows an example of hazard
histogram for .25g at one site in the southeast, and for a single seismicity
expert. Fortunately, this bi-modality shown in Figure 1 for S-expert 1, occurs
at different places for the other experts, hence the mixed data, as shown in
Figure 2 (not shown here), (mixed over all the S-experts) does not exhibit
such a high bi-modality, for this site, and the assumption of lognormality is
adequate for the present purpose. (This brings up a side comment,
specifically that if one starts removing one or several S-experts from the
analysis, the assumption of lognormality becomes poorer and poorer.)
Although I have not had a chance to review the case of all EUS sites, I
cannot, at this point, discount the possibility that the lognormality assumption
could be grossly wrong in some locations of the EUS.
LLNL-3
The values chosen for rmm are representative of most of the sites in the EUS.
There are a few cases, as shown in Figure 4 of the proposed document, for
which the LLNL values are drastically different from the selected values. It
could be, as it is mentioned in several places in the attachment, that those
anomalous values correspond to sites in the Gulf Coast area, where the
estimated hazard is very low anyway and leads to large uncertainties. It may
also be that the parameter should be region dependent.
LLNL-4
With the selected slope b = 3.5 the variation in the composite mean ground
motion aCEL at 2 10-4 could vary from 1.45 times the EPRI-LLNL composite
median aC to as much as 2.17 times (see table below).
(using aCEL = aC . rmm1/b)
rmm = (log [composite85/median])2
a
CEL/aC
85th/median
rmm
EPRI
LLNL
3.5
7
3.65
1.45
3.5
23.2
11.2
2.00
3.5
30.0
15.0
2.17
A-5


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business