 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Page Title:
Maintenance Job Request (MJR) Processing |
|
||
| ||||||||||
|
|  DOE-STD-1050-93
c)
Originator information is included on the form and is legible.
d)
Deficiency tag number and location are documented, if applicable.
e)
Failure/problem description is accurate and clearly stated.
f)
Identification of special conditions necessary to remove equipment
from service such as a limiting condition for operation, a sy stem
outage, or a major plant outage.
g)
Priority is assigned, technical safety requirements are identified, and
time limits for action are specified, if applicable.
3.4.1.3
Reviewed MJRs should be initialed by the owner/operator representative and
forwarded to the maintenance planning department.
3.4.1.4
The planning supervisor, or designated individual should review the MJR
and perform the following:
a)
Determine if the work on the Maintenance Job Request should be
performed as a minor maintenance task.
b)
Assign the MJR to the responsible craft planner.
3.4.1.5
The craft planner should review the MJR and perform the following:
a)
Verify the MJR is not a duplicate of an existing MJR.
b)
Walkdown of the identified deficiency. Use the walkdown checklist
(Appendix E) as necessary to assist with job planning.
c)
Verify the identified deficiency accurately describes the equipment
problem. For example, "waste disposal pump leaks," does not provide
enough information to assess the urgency of needed repairs or to
provide accurate direction in performing repairs on the pump. A more
accurate and quantitative problem description would be, 'The casing
flange on the waste disposal pump leaks 10 drops per minute during
pump operation at full load."
18
|
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |
Click
here for thousands of PDF manuals