|
| DOE-STD-1052-93
e) If the performance of scheduled predictive maintenance has the potential
of exceeding the grace period, the operations manager and the
maintenance manager, or designees, shall be informed and be directly
involved in the decision process.
f) Only operating equipment or equipment in standby should be placed in
predictive maintenance monitoring. Such monitoring should be
rescheduled at a time consistent with normal plant and equipment
operations.
3.4.4.7
Program Evaluation and Upgrade
a) Failures of equipment included in the predictive maintenance program
should have detailed root cause investigations to determine why the
program did not detect degradation before the failures occurred.
b) All personnel should be alert for possible inputs to the predictive
maintenance program that may be beneficial in improving plant
reliability and performance. These comments may result from work
performed by corrective maintenance or modification activities. Inputs
should be forwarded to the predictive maintenance coordinator.
c) Proposed additions or modifications to the predictive maintenance
program should be evaluated for applicability, potential benefit, and
cost-effectiveness.
d) Techniques proposed for use within the predictive maintenance
program should be evaluated for applicability, potential benefit, and
cost-effectiveness. Appendix I provides an example form for evaluating
proposed predictive maintenance program changes.
e) Periodic summary reports (e.g., monthly) to operations and
maintenance management describing the current status of the
predictive maintenance program and summarizing problems recently
identified or corrected should be provided by the predictive
maintenance coordinator. This report is useful for management to
assess program effectiveness.
19
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |