Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Task Frequency Optimization - Continued
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-1052-93
9.1.1.1
The "as-found" condition of equipment is recorded as a "score"
from 1 to 9 (1-lowest, 9-highest) during routine PM activities.
This score is determined by the supervisor or in conjunction with
the craftsperson who performed the job.
The minimum score of "1" for a PM task means that the
condition of the component is very close to failure. A maximum
score of "9" indicates that the component is in excellent
condition.
9.1.1.2
The overall general condition of the component is not evaluated.
Only the condition with regard to the specific work performed
by the PM is used in determining the "score." For example, the
description on a maintenance job request is "Valve Packing
Change-out." The score is determined by evaluating the
condition of the packing and whether it is close to failure or in
very good condition. The score is always related to a specific
component and should only be assigned while performing work
under a PM maintenance job request.  For example, if a
mechanic found that the valve packing was already leaking
before performing the PM task, then no score should be
assigned.
9.1.1.3
When performing a PM, a failure not related to the task and not
previously discovered may be uncovered. In this case, the
minimum score of "1" should be assigned and corrective
maintenance initiated to repair the component.
9.1.1.4
This method facilitates initiation of an evaluation to determine
if adjustments to PM task frequencies are warranted. The
following are typical criteria that may be used to initiate a
review of past PM performance to establish the basis to adjust
the interval of the task:
At least two consecutive high scores, as established by the
plant, may indicate the need to increase the interval
between PM task performances provided that no
corrective maintenance was performed between the two
periods.
A low score, as established by the plant, may indicate the
need to decrease the interval between PM tasks
performances.
D - 46


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business