|
| DOE-EM-STD-5505-96
After completing an interview, the information gathered should be evaluated to determine if there
are any apparent deviations from activity requirements. These leads can normally be validated or
disproved using one or more of the following:
Interviews with additional operators and shift supervisors
Interviews with additional investigation team members
Additional interviews with the activity manager or operations supervisor
Reviews of additional investigation reports
Reviews of program and policy procedures
6.6.5 Document Review. Documents that can be reviewed to assess this area include:
Site or activity procedures and policies on investigation of abnormal events
Training and qualification requirements for personnel involved in investigating reportable
events
Historical event report files
Trends and analysis of previous events
Lessons learned file
Abnormal event corrective action plans
The best way to evaluate an investigation program is to observe it in action. Another effective
method is to take an investigative report and associated records and review them. Items that an
assessor could look for when conducting reviews include:
The list of personnel contacted during the event. Were all personnel involved in the event
contacted to gain a complete picture of the event?
The root cause of the event. Does it make sense?
The overall format and content of the report. Is the report logically written, indicating that
the investigation was performed in a systematic fashion? Is there evidence of management
review and approval?
The thoroughness of the investigation. Did the investigator exhaust all avenues of potential
60
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |