Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Relationship Between the Two Standards
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-STD-6002-96
restoration. Relevant experience should be drawn from all applicable areas within the
DOE community in developing the needed guidance.
Accordingly, the basic intent of this set of Standards is to more clearly identify design
and operational safety requirements for fusion facilities and to provide guidance in
meeting those requirements. These Standards reflect recognition of the differences
between fusion facilities and other facilities.
2. Relationship Between the Two Standards. Two Standards have been produced. The
first, DOE-STD-6002-96, Safety of Magnetic Fusion Facilities: Requirements, is a
summary of requirements relative to safety of magnetic fusion facilities. With two
exceptions, requirements presented there come from CFRs, national consensus
standards, or best available information from recognized authoritative institutions
implemented within a fusion context. The exceptions, addressed in following para-
graphs, come from community consensus and the best judgment of the Fusion
Safety Steering Committee, charged with the responsibility of preparing these
documents.
The requirements, in DOE-STD-6002-96, convey a set of rules for use by owners,
managers, designers, and operators of a fusion facility to establish its design and
operating envelope to ensure that workers, the public, and the environment are pro-
tected from the facility's hazards. Capital investment protection was not a specific
goal of the requirements document. Because of the range of fusion facilities that may
come under the purview of this Standard and their differing hazards, the Standard
was not written to be prescriptive. It states what must be done, but not how. This
approach gives designers flexibility, but it also puts the burden on them to determine
how to implement the requirements for the specific facility. Furthermore, the use of
risk-informed prioritization or graded approach is recommended in meeting the
requirements.
DOE-STD-6003-96, Safety of Magnetic Fusion Facilities: Guidance is, as the name
indicates, guidance on how to achieve or implement the requirements set forth in the
Requirements Standard, DOE-STD-6002-96, assuming DOE regulation for an
engineering scale facility like ITER. Nothing in the guidance volume is intended to
add to the requirements, only to indicate methods and processes that may be used
to meet existing requirements. In that sense, it is subordinate to DOE-STD-6002-96.
The guidance provides an acceptable but not necessarily unique way to implement
the requirements for an experimental fusion facility such as ITER or DEMO. This
guidance would presumably be updated for eventual fusion power reactors, where
results from preceding experimental devices would resolve outstanding material,
plasma physics, and fusion technology issues that the present guidance document
has to accommodate.
3. Source of Requirements. The requirements in this Standard are based on require-
ments found in Federal regulations implemented within a fusion context and on input
16


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business