|
| DOE-STD-3006-2000
5.9.1.2.1 Name of the Facility/Activity Being Started. The name must be specific to what is to be
evaluated and started. For example, if a single process within a building is to be restarted, the facility
name would be the process name. On the other hand if the process encompasses several buildings and an
area, the name would be the encompassing process name.
5.9.1.2.1.1 Description of Facility/Activity. This includes buildings, systems, and processes included
in the startup or restart. The description may be instrumental in defining the scope of the review. For
example, if most support functions and procedures are outside the boundary of the facility being started
up, the ORR scope would focus on interfaces with existing programs. This section of the plan-of-action
defines the physical scope of the ORR. The physical scope may include systems, structures, and/or
processes.
5.9.1.2.1.2 Identification of the Responsible Contractor. This is the contractor who certifies
readiness of the facility to operate. It is normally the contractor who submits the responsible contractor
ORR plan-of-action.
5.9.1.2.2 Designation of Action as a New Start or Restart. This is the identification as to whether the
facility is being started for the first time or being restarted. It is reasonable that a new process within an
existing building would be a new startup. Resumption of a process after an extended period of no
operation would most reasonably be a restart.
5.9.1.2.2.1 New Start Discussion. The following elements or details of the facility should be
included to support or create the basis for the recommended decisions:
C Hazard categorization for new facility and basis for the designation (criticality, explosive,
chemical, environmental, etc); and
C Acquisition costs for new facility or process.
5.9.1.2.2.2 Restart Discussion. If the action is a restart of an existing facility or process, the
following information should be provided to support the follow on decisions:
C Hazard categorization of the facility once restarted and basis for determination (criticality,
explosive, chemical, environmental, etc.). In the event that no formal hazard categorization has
been made, a discussion of the relative hazard is appropriate;
47
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |