|
| DOE-STD-1136-2004
Guide of Good Practices for Occupational Radiological Protection in Uranium Facilities
1.
A mask fit has been completed within the previous year.
2.
The individual presenting the mask fit certification card has not changed physical
appearance in a way that would affect the seal of the mask to the face. For example, this
could be determined by a combination of: review of photograph on mask fit certification
card (if available), examination of facial hair on areas which could affect mask seal, and
discussion with wearer of any physical changes which could affect mask seal.
3.
The facility has the masks available that the individual is certified to wear.
If there are members of the public who live or work near a uranium facility, a plan for orientation
of members of the public should be developed to inform them of facility activities. Such a plan should
include information on the concerns that require protection of people from potential injuries by uranium,
the general protective measures used at the facility to confine it and keep it out of the public domain, and
solicitation of information on the concerns of members of the local public about uranium. To the extent
possible, efforts should be made to allay those concerns. The information in the public education plan
should also be provided to local news media.
3.3
RELATED PROGRAMS
3.3.1 Onsite Packaging and Transportation
The hazardous materials organization conducts onsite radioactive shipments with the assistance of
radiological control. This program requires the hazardous materials organization representatives to review
onsite radioactive shipping records, document the errors or omissions observed, and evaluate trends and
revise training as needed. Serious deficiencies are to be documented and the reports should be submitted in
accordance with DOE O 460.1B, Packaging and Transportation Safety (DOE 2003b).
The packaging organization is responsible for coordinating onsite package design and prepara-
tion of safety analysis documentation. The following sections describe typical process, review, and
approval requirements for onsite safety analysis documentation.
3.3.1.1 Initiation
New safety analysis documentation or reviews/changes to existing documentation can be
requested by a user organization based on programmatic or operational requirements. The request is
submitted in writing to the packaging organization and includes proper justification and support
documentation. The packaging organization makes routine revisions as necessary to reflect policy and
regulation changes.
3.3.1.2 Preparation
The packaging organization coordinates the analysis, prepares safety analysis documentation,
and guides the documentation through the review and approval process, including the resolution of
review comments and the obtaining of required approval.
3-21
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |