Control

DOE-STD-1136-2004

Guide of Good Practices for Occupational Radiological Protection in Uranium Facilities

3.3.1.3 Control

Safety analysis documentation is prepared and maintained according to facility policy. The

document control system provides an accessible, auditable, and retrievable method for maintaining and

changing safety analytic documentation.

3.3.1.4 Review and Approval Cycle

Safety analysis documentation is reviewed, approved, and changed according to facility policy.

Additional reviews and approvals include the following people and organizations:

user,

cognizant engineer,

packaging organization,

quality assurance,

responsible environmental assurance organization, onsite only,

packaging, shipping, and waste safety assurance organization,

criticality engineering analysis, if criticality analysis is required,

packaging and shipping approval authority, and

DOE field office, if the package is to be used for HRCQ inter-area shipments.

3.3.1.5 Approval for Editorial Changes

Inconsequential editorial changes to a safety analysis document may be approved at the

operating level.

3.3.1.6 Utilization

Once a safety analysis document is approved, copies are sent to the affected organizations,

including operations and applicable facility engineering, to incorporate the administrative controls from

the safety analysis document into the affected operating documents. User organizations must obtain the

packaging organization review of all operating procedures that incorporate instructions or administrative

controls found in COCS, SARPS, SEPS, DAPS, DOT exemptions, and Federal and state packaging

requirements to ensure that they are properly incorporated.

Onsite packages currently approved for onsite use should be cataloged and described in a

hazardous materials packaging directory maintained by the packaging organization. New packages are

added to the directory as they are developed and approved.

3-22