Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Release Estimation
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-HDBK-3010-94
7.0 Application Examples; Seismic Release Example
glovebox, the metal dissolving glovebox, the north half of the residue dissolving glovebox,
and the liquid sampling glovebox.
7.3.10.2
Release Estimation
The use of release fraction information for estimating seismic releases will be examined in
general. Possible release mechanisms will be considered for the 0.13g event, the 0.26g
event, and the 0.3g event assuming partial collapse of the facility.
A. 0.13g Event. As described in the hazard summary, this event will have little
substantial impact on process equipment or glovebox lines, even though it will do
some damage to structure internals. The majority of plutonium driven airborne will
come from vibration of uncontained plutonium powder or surface contamination. The
latter topic has been largely ignored in examples to this point because of the large
amount of process material involvement in the accidents examined.
The only process material that may be expected to release non-trivial amounts of
airborne plutonium are loose bulk powders exposed to the glovebox atmosphere
during the seismic vibration. In the feed preparation glovebox, a maximum of 2000 g
of loose bulk powder can be exposed in both the weighing and batching and furnace
stations. Another 1320 g of plutonium as oxide might feasibly be in a charge can in
the conveyor or on the glovebox floor. The can holding this oxide could tip over, but
the spring-hinged lid will not dislodge. To be very conservative, this phenomena
could be accounted for as well. It is more properly shock-vibration than free-fall spill
because no real spill in air or falling distance is involved.
Up to 2300 g of plutonium in peroxide cake can be exposed outside containers in the
precipitation line. This material is damp, but can be included if more conservatism is
desired. The containers in the calcining and hydrofluorination gloveboxes have
screw-on lids and are unlikely to be affected. Up to 2300 g of predominantly
plutonium oxide in the calciner may be sitting in the first-cycle dryer pan. The same
material may be being loaded into the calciner hopper at the precise moment the event
occurs and may spill. A maximum of 2000 g of plutonium as plutonium fluoride may
be sitting in a reduction crucible awaiting loading into the reduction furnace.
For all of the above to be happening requires considerable synchronicity between
operations and the seismic event. Even if it does, however, the resulting source term
is not large. The bounding ARF and RF values assessed for vibration-shock impact
of bulk powder on an unyielding surface are 1E-3 and 0.1 (subsection 4.4.3.3.1).
The bounding ARF and RF for free-fall spill of powder less than 3 m are 2E-3 and
Page 7-67


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business