Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Release Estimation cont'd
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-HDBK-3010-94
7.0 Application Examples; Seismic Release Example
0.6 (subsection 4.4.3.1). If all of the events described above occur, with the 2300 g
in the calciner spilled as opposed to being vibrated, the cumulative initial respirable
source term within the glovebox atmospheres is:
(9,620 g * 1.0 * 1E-3 * 0.1) + (2300 g * 1.0 * 2E-3 * 0.6) = 3.7 g
The precise amount of plutonium surface contamination cannot be determined. Even
survey measurements cannot accurately identify quantities due to shielding
uncertainties and the sheer size of the potentially contaminated areas. The type of
surface contamination is relevant as well. Unlike loose surface contamination, fixed
surface contamination is unlikely to be dislodged to an appreciable degree except by
extremely violent events. The inability to dislodge such material by normal cleaning
actions testifies to the difficulty of removing such material. Another type of
contamination is material holdup in piping and vessels. This material does not receive
the direct or undamped type of stress that other contamination would. Further,
whatever portion of this material is driven airborne is unlikely to be released from
initial confinement if vessel or piping failure does not occur.
This example will concentrate on loose surface contamination outside vessels and
process piping, as it is a reasonable assumption that this is the primary material of
concern for airborne release due to seismic vibrations. Existing studies (Allen,
Arrowsmith, Charlot, and Hooper, 1978) indicate that a surface contamination level
of 0.7 g/ft2 is the level of contamination that would be visible to the naked eye.
Historical data from a mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility indicated a surface
contamination level of 0.1 g/ft2 inside gloveboxes was representative of powder
handling operations (Mishima, Schwendiman, and Ayer, 1978). There is no firm
basis for estimating contamination in less dirty, non-powder operations, but common
practice is to consider contamination levels in such operations at least an order of
magnitude less than those for powder operations. Typical estimates for glovebox
holdup magnitudes are in the range of 0 to 50 g, with interior equipment holdup
estimates going to as high as hundreds to thousands of grams for large furnace and
incinerator operations.
The internal surface area of the gloveboxes is determined from their measurements.
In this construct, that value is multiplied by a factor of 1.25 or 1.5 depending on how
much equipment relative to volume there is in a given glovebox. None of the
plutonium recovery facility gloveboxes have visible surface contamination over
significant areas. Therefore, the available surface area estimate is multiplied by
0.1 g/ft2 for powder handling operations, and 0.01 g/ft2 for liquid operations.
Resulting surface contamination estimates are listed on the following page.
Page 7-68


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business