|
| DOE-HDBK-3012-96
TL
2.
Remember that team members must not only have technical experience relevant to
their assignment, but also must have assessment experience and be familiar with
the facility/process in question. Typically, familiarization with the facility/process
is gained during the previsit. In determining the number of team members,
experience indicates more members for less time is the best option.
3.
Determine whether any conflict of interest, actual or perceived, exists for any
candidate or source of candidates. If so, those candidates must be rejected from
further consideration. A real conflict of interest (COI) would exist for a contractor
who has, previous to the ORR, provided direct support to a facility in an area which
will be reviewed during the ORR. For example, DOE has used mentors at some
facilities to assist in improving the conduct of operations at the facility. It would be
inappropriate for this contractor to be a part of the ORR team.
A perceived COI could exist when a contractor has provided indirect support to the
facility or was an employee of the facility at some other point in their career. An
example of indirect support could be participation on a review team evaluating
facility safety basis documentation. The second case is self explanatory. These
cases are more subjective, but the TL should be sensitive to them and avoid them if
possible.
4.
No individual directly involved in the management or operation of a facility can
participate as a team member in his/her area of responsibility at the facility.
5.
With regard to selecting administrative staff for the ORR, it must be noted that the
administration of the forms and summaries is a prodigious task. It has been found
that one person (the ORR Review Coordinator) should be dedicated to
administering the forms, e.g., logging in and tracking. This task is very time
consuming once forms begin being turned in and increases as the ORR progresses.
In addition, at least one other person with a word processor should be dedicated to
editing the forms. Consideration should be given to bringing in supplemental editing
staff toward the close of the ORR. It should also be recognized that a significant
amount of copying will need to be accomplished at the close of the ORR.
6.
Concurrent with the above tasks, work with the site point-of-contact to obtain
counterparts. A counterpart is an individual designated by the site to assist in
coordinating the ORR team's inspection activities. Each ORR team member should
have a counterpart for each functional area under evaluation.
2
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |