|
| DOE-HDBK-1078-94
Instructions--Check each item after review:
1.
Will each TES measure how well the trainee performs?
2.
Is each TES written at the task level?
3.
Does each TES represent the best approximation to actual task performance that can be
made, considering cost, time, and ability to measure?
4.
In situations where an end product was available for inspection, was the acceptance
criteria incorporated in the TES?
5.
Are TES criteria adequate to require proficient performance without being unnecessarily
high?
6.
Do criteria of the TES reflect the desired level of proficiency?
7.
Have specific instructions for administration and evaluation of the TES been provided?
8.
Has subjectivity in scoring been minimized?
9.
For TESs in which a process has been broken down into several observable elements, are
the selected elements representative of the process, and can they predict successful
performance?
10. Has the TES been validated on a representative sample of the target population?
11. Does the TES require that the task be "performed" in those cases where performance is
suitable and feasible?
12. Have those TESs, for which constraints preclude performance in the job environment,
been verified as having high-fidelity?
109
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |