|
| DOE-HDBK-1078-94
6.2.1 Frequency Distributions. Frequency distributions should be used for
organizing, summarizing, and displaying data. They can be constructed using
simple counting, averaging, and graphing procedures that show how often
particular events have occurred. They are normally used as the first step in
analyzing responses to surveys and trainee progress test results.
After all data from the indicators is collected, responses are tabulated. Totals
are then entered into the corresponding spaces on a blank survey. The average
(mean) response for each item is calculated and displayed on a bar chart. The
bar chart presents survey information in a simple visual form. It highlights high
and low values and permits easy comparison with acceptable performance
standards or sets of previous data.
6.2.2 Exception Analysis. Exception analysis is used for reviewing data to detect
unacceptable variations from a predefined standard. Facility operating,
maintenance, and industrial safety experience should be analyzed using this
method. Increases in the frequency of accidents, injuries, personnel errors,
rework or unscheduled maintenance, or increases in overtime above normal
levels may indicate a need to provide additional training or improve existing
training. Acceptable levels should be established for each of these parameters
as criteria for comparison. If any observed value deviates from the criteria, the
cause should be investigated.
Feedback from employees and employee exams, supervisors, and instructor
and trainee critiques should be analyzed to indicate if any training problem
needs to be investigated.
6.2.3 Content Analysis. Content analysis depends primarily on the expertise and
professional judgment of the individuals performing it. Content analysis should
be considered for use with all types of information and may be used in
conjunction with exception analysis. Interview responses should be analyzed
using content analysis. The following guidelines should be used when
performing content analysis:
1.
Look for agreement. If respondents provide the same or similar
answers, these answers are more likely to be valid;
2.
Do not disregard responses. Do not attempt to "second-guess"
employees, supervisors, or subject matter experts. If a response
appears erroneous or exaggerated, follow up with observations and
additional discussion; and
3.
Focus the analysis on discovering specific tasks or subject areas in
which training refinements seem necessary.
61
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |