Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Limitations of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-HDBK-1100-2004
catastrophic consequences. When a safety, redundant, or back-up component is evaluated, the
analysis should consider the conditions that generated the need for the component.
DOCUMENTING THE RESULTS.
A FMEA generates a qualitative, systematic reference list of
equipment, failure modes, and effects. The results of a FMEA are usually listed in tabular
format, by equipment item. Table 4.20 shows a typical worksheet used in performing a FMEA.
For each equipment item, the failure modes for that item and, if desired, the root causes for that
failure mode are identified. For each failure mode, a worst-case estimate of the consequences is
identified. This worst-case estimate assumes the failure of all protection against both the failure
itself and the undesired consequences of the failure. The method by which the failure is
detected is specified along with any compensating provisions. Finally, any suggestions for
improving safety are listed in the table.
The PSM Rule requires that a FMEA be performed by a team, all of whose members participate
in the analysis. The most practical means of performing the FMEA is to prepare blank
worksheets on viewgraphs or on a large display screen. For each equipment item, the PrHA
team reaches a consensus on its failure modes and their causes, effects, detection methods,
compensating provisions, severity (if desired), and any remarks or action items.
Staff requirements for a FMEA vary with the size and complexity of equipment items being
analyzed. The time and cost of a FMEA is proportional to the size of the process and
number of components analyzed. On average, an hour is sufficient to analyze two to four
equipment items. For processes or systems in which similar equipment items perform similar
functions, the time requirements for completing a FMEA are reduced. Table 4.21 presents
estimates of the time needed to perform a PrHA using the FMEA method (CCPS, 1992).
4.5.3 Limitations of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Human operator errors are not usually examined in a FMEA, but the effects of human error are
indicated by an equipment failure mode. FMEAs rarely investigate damage or injury that could
arise if the system or process operated successfully. Because FMEAs focus on single event
failures, they are not efficient for identifying an exhaustive list of combinations of equipment
failures that lead to accidents.
4.5.4 Example Failure Mode and Effects Analyses
Partial FMEAs for the example processes described in Section 4.0 are shown in Tables 4.22
and 4.23.
4.6
Fault Tree Analysis
4.6.1 Description of the Method
FTA is a systematic, deductive failure analysis that focuses on a particular accident or undesired
event called the "top event" and develops the underlying sequence of events leading to the top
event. A separate FTA must be performed for each top event.
54


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business