Outcome - hdbk114820020169

Outcome: The Work Smart Standards are accepted as authoritative for purposes of contract performance(adequacy and feasibility

have been confirmed).

Mechanism and Criteria

Attributes of Effectiveness

ISM Verification

Objectives

A. Process Management

1) Agreement Parties are recognized

A. The responsibility for oversight to confirm effective

DOE.1, BBC.1,

and fully represented in the

performance is defined by current management systems. [M-

MG.1

selection of Approval Parties.

2.a]

B. It is a guiding principle of Process design that the WSS set

represent a basis of agreement among all parties who must

agree (that the standards provide adequate protection and are

feasible). [M-2.c]

C. To provide flexibility the Process permits the Convened Group

(who represent the authority of the Agreement Parties) to

designate the level and identity of the Approval Authority. [M-

2.e]

D. The contractor shall ensure that ES&H functions (including

WSS approval) are a visible part of work planning and

execution. [D-(b)]

E. Clear and unambiguous lines of authority and responsibility for

ensuring ES&H are established and maintained. [D-(b), (2)]

A. The value of affording all appropriate Stakeholders (and other

2) Process leadership and the

BBC.2, HAZ.2,

Convened Group demonstrate

affected parties) an opportunity to contribute to the Process

MG.3

cannot be overemphasized. [M-2.f]

that inputs of Stakeholders and

the DNFSB were solicited and

B. The Process leader(s) and Convened Group identify

dispositions provided.

Stakeholder (and other affected party) concerns. [M-II.2.c]

C. Stakeholder input to the Process is managed by the Convened

Group. [M-II.3.b.(5)]

D. The contractor shall ensure that ES&H functions are a visible

part of work planning (including standards identification) and

execution. [D-(b)]