Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Final Identification of Life-Limiting Components
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOESTD107393
representatives of the engineering, operations, and maintenance departments. Proper selection of the
MCA team is vital to success.
The collection of information or data and the performance of MCA evaluations will likely be
accomplished in several iterations. Information developed or conclusions reached at a given point in
the program may invalidate prior information or conclusions, or it may indicate that more detail or
additional information is necessary. Data gathering may occur in stages as the aging evaluations
indicate the need for more data. Sources of information or data used to support the conclusions should
be documented.
Initially, the action plan should provide the greatest detail for those activities that need to be completed
in the near term. Moreover, the action plan should provide detailed discussions of those activities that
have already been completed. The MCA action plan may be revised and updated as the program
progresses.
4.2.1.2 MCA Governing and Implementing Procedures
The contractor should develop governing and implementing procedures for the MCA adjunct program.
Governing procedures serve to indicate the correlation of the action plan with the program plan and to
coordinate the implementing procedures with each other and with the action plan. Governing
procedures are, in effect, an umbrella document or overview of the implementation process.
Development of facility implementing procedures to support the action plan is necessary to ensure a
consistent approach to MCA and to promote the successful and cost-effective completion of the MCA
program. These procedures should address and control responsibilities associated with the
performance of analyses and with the preparation, review, and approval of documents. The
procedures should provide specific methods for identification of life-limiting components, detailed aging
degradation evaluations, determination of facility remaining lifetime, and feasibility for continued
operations or life extension.
4.2.2 FINAL IDENTIFICATION OF LIFE-LIMITING COMPONENTS
The final list of life-limiting components should be developed through a structured process based on
established criteria and a detailed scoring methodology. This list of components provides the subjects
for the detailed MCA analysis. A flow diagram for the identification of life-limiting components is shown
in Figure 42.
The primary activities of this process are:
Screen SSCs to identify components that are potentially life-limiting.
Determine significance to facility lifetime of potentially life-limiting components.
Identify the life-limiting components.
Personnel knowledgeable about the facility and its safety analysis should perform the screening of
SSCs to identify those components that are potentially life-limiting. These components should meet
one or more of the following criteria:
Replacement cost is large.
Replacement schedule is long.
Failure may have significant impact on facility safety.
Known history of safety concern exists.
Operating conditions or environment are relatively harsh.
II-89


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business