Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Sources of Changes cont'd
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOESTD107393
Acceptable operations changes are only those that have been documented and evaluated to ensure
consistency with the design requirements. Unreviewed operations changes can cause inadvertent
deviations from the design requirements. For example, adjustments in instrument and equipment
setpoints can have adverse secondary effects on such engineering considerations as safety margins and
response times. Similarly, lifted leads, jumpers, and other temporary physical changes need careful
attention.
Maintenance activities can also be a major contributor to changes in the facility. Effective controls are
essential to ensure that unevaluated changes are not introduced into the facility by maintenance
personnel. Therefore, clear guidance on the conduct of maintenance should be provided to ensure that
the differences between a change and routine maintenance are known and understood. Under adequate
change controls, the maintenance organization may not make physical changes except when it is acting
as the constructor for an approved physical change or is making changes within the design envelope.
Maintenance activities that change the facility without an evaluation for consistency with the design
requirements are unacceptable. The work control program, which manages and sequences
maintenance activities in the field, is the vehicle to implement effective change control.
Acceptable maintenance activities involve the routine repair or restoration of facility hardware without
altering the physical or functional characteristics (i.e., the design requirements). Maintenance may
replace a part or SSC with an identical item (i.e., identical make and model number, identical constituent
parts, identical function, etc.). Identical replacements do not involve a change to the physical
configuration, the facility documentation, or the design requirements. An equipment replacement with
anything other than the identical part constitutes a change. In other words, the facility physical
configuration is no longer the same, and the corresponding facility documentation should be updated to
reflect the physical change.
To support maintenance activities, the design engineering organization may predefine acceptable
replacements or changes (other than the identical item) and provide this information to the
maintenance organization in the form of a design envelope. Design envelopes provide the
preapproved set of limits or constraints within which changes may be made without exceeding the
design requirements. Maintenance changes that lend themselves to design envelopes are changes to
torque values, maintenance assembly sequences, machining tolerances, heat exchanger tube plugging
limits, rotating equipment vibration limits, or other routine activities where design envelopes can be
established. If a proposed change is not within the bounds of the defined design envelope or if no
envelope has been provided, the change involves a design change and may not be made without
design engineering evaluation.
Procurement of replacement parts to support maintenance activities can introduce unidentified and
uncontrolled changes. Procurement changes may result from changes in suppliers or changes in
production by current suppliers. For example, the procurement organization might purchase a slightly
different (but manufacturer's equivalent) lubricant for a pump. Procurement of replacement parts that
differ from the original item should be identified for technical review. Any difference, including a so-
called manufacturer's equivalent, needs to be formally evaluated and documented by the design
engineering organization to ensure that safety and reliability have not been degraded and that
conformance to the design requirements is maintained. Timely identification and evaluation of
procurement changes can enhance maintenance productivity.
Each facility will need to thoroughly review existing work practices to identify every change source.
Some change sources are subtle and can be overlooked. For example, facility and document changes
can be introduced through software changes. Software has diverse applications, from supporting
design analysis and documentation to performing safety functions as part of the facility configuration.
As such, software changes can lead to any of the three basic change types. Software that reflects
I-B-11


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business