|
| DOE-STD-1052-93
7.8.3.5
If the answers to any of the above questions are "yes," the
failure mode should be addressed by a PM task or be evaluated
for a possible design change to eliminate or control the failure
mode. If the answers to the questions are "no," and the
likelihood for failure is also low, then the failure mode is
considered to be insignificant since the consequences may be
tolerated. If a failure mode may be tolerated, it is not essential
to perform a PM task to mitigate the failure. If all failure modes
may be tolerated, the component was incorrectly selected as
FCE and the component should be considered for run-to-failure
operation. Existing PM tasks for the component should be
considered for possible deletion.
If the failure mode should be addressed by a PM task, indicate
"yes" in the column marked "significant mode" of the FMEA
tabulation form and select a PM task as described in Section 8,
"Preventive, Maintenance Task Selection and Implementation"
7.8.3.6
Before the FMEA is approved, it should be reviewed by
knowledgeable technical support and maintenance personnel to
ensure the analysis was comprehensive and technically accurate.
FMEA reviews may be performed in meetings with the
appropriate personnel to expedite the review and gain insight for
future analysis.
7.9
History Review
The history review plays a vital role in the PM program enhancement effort. For the
system analysis process, the review should be conducted after the FMEA. This helps
to avoid biasing the outcome of the analysis to only agree with the results of the
history review. This may result in overlooking some failure modes or inadequately
addressing some components.
After the FMEA is completed, the history and all the activities routinely scheduled for
the component should be reviewed. At least two operating cycles, approximately
three years, of corrective and preventive maintenance data along with any surveillance
data should be evaluated. History for components performing identical functions in
similar environments for multi-unit sites should be included. Data older than two
cycles may be of limited value since it may not reveal any new failure modes or the
cause of the failure may have been subsequently resolved. When reviewing the
component's history, the analyst should attempt to identify the following:
failure modes
D - 32
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |