|
| DOE-STD-1063-2006
Appendix A
EXAMPLE REPORT - RED RUN Site
Performance Indicators for First Quarter CY2006
(January 2006 through March 2006)
Submitted April 30, 2006
STAFFING
TYPE *
INDICATOR NAME
INDICATOR VALUE
DOE GOAL
DOE-wide
Staffing level (%)
90% [9 of 10]
100%
DOE-wide
Attrition
1 - Promotion
N/A
TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION
TYPE
INDICATOR NAME
INDICATOR VALUE
DOE GOAL
DOE-wide
% of Facility
None specified
100% [9 of 9]
Representatives Core
Qualified
DOE-wide
% of Facility
None specified
100% [9 of 9]
Representatives Interim
Qualified
DOE-wide
% of Facility
Greater than 80%
78% [7 of 9]
Representatives Fully
Qualified
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS
TYPE
INDICATOR NAME
INFORMATION
DOE GOAL
DOE-wide
Accomplishments
None specified
Facility Representatives at the nuclear fuel
facility recognized the potential for a high
airborne radioactivity condition being caused
by leak-by of a contaminated system
pressure relief valve. Air samples conducted
as a result of the Facility Representatives'
questions confirmed a high airborne
condition.
A Facility Representative observed a worker
who was working approximately 21 feet
above a concrete slab without using fall
protection equipment. The worker
immediately began using the safety
equipment and the safety manager briefed
workers on the incident.
FULFILLING THE FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE ROLE
TYPE
INDICATOR NAME
INDICATOR VALUE
GOAL
DOE-wide
Facility Representative
55%
Greater than 40%
Time Spent in the
Plant/Field
DOE-wide
Facility Representative
70%
Greater than 6 5%
Time Spent Performing
Contractor Oversight
* All samples in this table are DOE -wide indicators. Field elements may provide
additional site -specific performance indicators.
A-5
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |