Responsible Contractor Oversight Organizations.

DOE-STD-3006-95

Compiling supporting documentation;

Providing a determination that the activity complies with applicable environmental

requirements and federal and state laws and regulations;

Executing ORR criteria/performance objectives as assigned in the ORR Implementation plan

or by the ORR team leadership;

Verifying that all documentation of safety, quality, or environment issues are in place;

Concurring with the determination of operational readiness and the conclusions presented in

the ORR report in the team members area of assessment;

Submitting completed certification documentation for review and approval;

Preparing supporting or special reports;

Working with other ORR team personnel to ensure timely resolution of the checklist items;

and,

Assisting, as requested, the team leader and senior members in preparation of the ORR

Report.

5.1.6 Responsible Contractor Oversight Organizations. The level of participation of the

responsible contractor's Oversight Organizations (e.g., Safety, Quality Assurance, Environment) in

the ORR process will depend on the individual contractor's organization and the scope of ORR being

performed. It is recommended that members from the contractor's Oversight Organizations

participate in the readiness review process as ORR team members. If other internal reviews are

essential to achieving readiness of the facility, the reviews should be completed as a prerequisite to the

contractor's ORR.

5.1.7 Contractor's Determining the Scope of the ORR. The scope (breadth and depth) of the

ORR should include the identification of the processes and systems, documentation, and management

controls (including procedures, personnel, and programmatic functions). The functional areas to be

assessed during the ORR should be identified. A graded approach can be used as part of the process

used to determine the depth to which each core requirement will be reviewed. Appendix 1 of this

standard contains a discussion of the graded approach.

A unique, first-of-a-kind, or complex activity should involve a review with a more extensive scope

than a routine restart of an existing activity. This scope will be affected by the facility's size,